Computational Elucidation of the Transition State Shape Selectivity Phenomenon

The most commonly cited example of a transition state shape selective reaction, m-xylene disproportionation in zeolites, is examined to determine if the local spatial environment of a reaction can significantly alter selectivity. In the studied reaction, ZPE-corrected rate limiting energy barriers a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American Chemical Society Vol. 126; no. 3; pp. 936 - 947
Main Authors Clark, Louis A, Sierka, Marek, Sauer, Joachim
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington, DC American Chemical Society 28.01.2004
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The most commonly cited example of a transition state shape selective reaction, m-xylene disproportionation in zeolites, is examined to determine if the local spatial environment of a reaction can significantly alter selectivity. In the studied reaction, ZPE-corrected rate limiting energy barriers are 136 kJ/mol for the methoxide-mediated pathway and 109 to 145 kJ/mol for the diphenylmethane-mediated pathway. Both pathways are likely to contribute to selectivity and disfavor one product isomer (1,3,5-trimethylbenzene), but relative selectivity to the other two isomers varies with pore geometry, mechanistic pathway, and inclusion of entropic effects. Most importantly, study of one pathway in three different common zeolite framework types (FAU, MFI, and MOR) allows explicit and practically oriented consideration of pore shape. Variation of the environment shape at the critical transition states is thus shown to affect the course of reaction. Barrier height shifts on the order of 10−20 kJ/mol are achievable. Observed selectivities do not agree with the transition state characteristics calculated here and, hence, are most likely due to product shape selectivity. Further examination of the pathways highlights the importance of mechanistic steps that do not result in isomer-defining bonds and leads to a more robust definition of transition state shape selectivity.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/TPS-TF78KZTP-7
istex:192E2CDD926A8BB33684A4AECD998A2B3FCA626F
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-7863
1520-5126
DOI:10.1021/ja0381712