Antimicrobial Residue Detection in Chicken Yolk Samples Following Administration to Egg-Producing Chickens and Effects of Residue Detection on Competitive Exclusion Culture (PREEMPT) Establishment

• Published in: Journal of agricultural and food chemistry Vol. 48; no. 12; pp. 6435 - 6438
• Main Authors: McReynolds, Jackson L, Caldwell, Denise Y, McElroy, Audrey P, Hargis, Billy M, Caldwell, David J
• Format: Journal Article Conference Proceeding
• Language: English
• Published: Washington, DC American Chemical Society 01.12.2000
• Subjects: Animal productions; Animals; Antibiotic Prophylaxis - methods; Antibiotic Prophylaxis - veterinary; Biological and medical sciences; Chick Embryo - chemistry; Drug Residues - analysis; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Egg and egg product industries; Food industries; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Terrestrial animal productions; Time Factors; Vertebrates; Egg yolk; Farming animal; Competitive exclusion; Poultry; Propionic acid; Method; Infection; Vertebrata; Antibiotic; Sanitary control; Residue; Gastrointestinal diseases; Antibiotic resistance; Chicken; Aves; Detection
• ISSN: 0021-8561; 1520-5118
• DOI: 10.1021/jf000140s

Competitive exclusion (CE) cultures may offer alternatives to antimicrobial agents for disease prophylaxis in poultry. To avoid potential transfer of antibiotic resistance, safe and effective CE cultures must, by necessity, be highly sensitive to antimicrobial residues. The following studies evaluated the effect of maternal administration of selected antibiotics on the establishment of a licensed CE culture, PREEMPT. Selected antibiotics were administered to actively laying hens for a period of 7 days (experiment 1) or 9 days (experiment 2) in drinking water [sulfadimethoxine (0.05%), enrofloxacin (0.005%), and tylosin tartrate (0.05%)] or feed (sulfadimethoxine with ormetoprim, 250 ppm). In experiment 1, fertile eggs were collected daily and subjected to bioassay for detectable antimicrobial residues in yolk. Antimicrobial residues were not detected during the 7 days of treatment or the subsequent 3 days following cessation of treatment in the control, sulfadimethoxine, sulfadimethoxine with ormetoprim, or tylosin treatment groups. However, detectable residues were observed in eggs derived from enrofloxacin-treated hens on days 6 and 7 during antibiotic administration and also on days 2 and 3 post-antibiotic administration. In experiment 2, antimicrobial residues were also only detected in yolks from hens treated with enrofloxacin. Residue detection occurred on days 2−6 of antibiotic administration, on day 9 of antibiotic administration, on days 1−3 post-antibiotic administration, and also on day 7 post-antibiotic administration. A subset of eggs from each experimental group, corresponding to days 2−6 of antibiotic administration, days 4−6 post-antibiotic administration, and days 14−16 post-antibiotic administration, were pooled for incubation, and chicks hatched from these pools of fertile eggs were treated with PREEMPT at hatch. When 48-h cecal propionate concentrations were used as an index of culture establishment, reduced (P < 0.05) efficacy was observed only in chicks derived from enrofloxacin-treated hens at either collection period. Although several antibiotics do not appear to produce detectable egg residues or interfere with CE culture establishment, these data suggest that chicks derived from enrofloxacin-treated hens may not be candidates for safe and effective CE culture treatment. Keywords: Chicken; competitive exclusion; chicks; propionate; antibiotics