Gas Hydrate Saturation Estimates, Gas Hydrate Occurrence, and Reservoir Characteristics Based on Well Log Data from the Hydrate-01 Stratigraphic Test Well, Alaska North Slope

The Hydrate-01 Stratigraphic Test Well was drilled at the Kuparuk 7-11-12 site on the Alaska North Slope in December 2018. Sonic log data provide compressional (P) and shear (S) slowness from which we determine gas hydrate saturation (S gh) estimates using effective medium theory. The sonic S gh est...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEnergy & fuels Vol. 36; no. 6; pp. 3040 - 3050
Main Authors Haines, Seth S, Collett, Timothy S, Yoneda, Jun, Shimoda, Naoyuki, Boswell, Ray, Okinaka, Norihiro
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Chemical Society 17.03.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The Hydrate-01 Stratigraphic Test Well was drilled at the Kuparuk 7-11-12 site on the Alaska North Slope in December 2018. Sonic log data provide compressional (P) and shear (S) slowness from which we determine gas hydrate saturation (S gh) estimates using effective medium theory. The sonic S gh estimates compare favorably with S gh estimated from resistivity and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) logs, showing that gas hydrate occupies up to approximately 90% of the pore space in the target reservoir sands. The informally named B1 sand (2294 feet below mean sea level) shows lower V P/V S ratios than the D1 sand (2770 feet below mean sea level), with the lower part of the B1 sand showing lower V P/V S ratios than the upper part of the B1 sand. This corresponds to a stiffer, or more “cemented”, behavior for the lower B1 sand and less cemented behavior for the D1 sand. This trend could be due to differences in the reservoirs themselves or in the gas hydrate morphology or to both factors. We observe that the presence of gas hydrate in the upper B1 sand has greater impact on hydraulic permeability (measurements suggest a greater difference between intrinsic and effective permeability) than in the D1 sand, possibly related to gas hydrate morphology but more likely due simply to higher gas hydrate saturations in the upper B1 sand. Analyses of S gh relative to porosity, shale fraction, and intrinsic permeability show that reservoir quality (as represented by these three metrics) exerts control on gas hydrate saturation. Grain size and mineralogy data show somewhat smaller grains and better sorting in the D1 reservoir relative to the upper B1 reservoir and smaller grains and greater clay fraction in the lower B1 reservoir relative to the other two reservoir zones. Together, these data suggest that reservoir characteristics play a role in the observed V P/V S patterns, but gas hydrate morphology (possibly varying with saturation) must also be considered.
Bibliography:USDOE
ISSN:0887-0624
1520-5029
DOI:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c04100