The use of magnetite as a geochemical indicator in the exploration for magmatic Ni-Cu-PGE sulfide deposits: A case study from Munali, Zambia

• Published in: Journal of geochemical exploration Vol. 188; pp. 172 - 184
• Main Authors: Ward, Laura A., Holwell, David A., Barry, Tiffany L., Blanks, Daryl E., Graham, Shaun D.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 01.05.2018
• Subjects: Indicator minerals; LA-ICP-MS; Magmatic sulfides; Magnetite; Ni-Cu-PGE; LA-ICP-MS; Magmatic sulfides; Magnetite; Ni-Cu-PGE; Indicator minerals
• ISSN: 0375-6742; 1879-1689
• DOI: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2018.01.018

Magmatic sulfide deposits hosted by mafic-ultramafic intrusions are the most important source of Ni and PGE on Earth. Exploration strategies rely on geophysics to identify the host intrusions, and surface geochemistry to identify anomalous concentrations of Cu, Ni, Co, Cr, As and other associated elements. The use of geochemical indicator minerals in overburden is used widely in diamond exploration and mineral chemistry in fresh rock is increasingly used to identify proxies for mineralisation in magmatic-hydrothermal systems. However, no indicator mineral techniques are routinely applied to magmatic sulfides. Magnetite represents an ideal indicator mineral for this mineralisation style due to its ubiquity in such deposits, its resistance to weathering, its recoverability from soil samples, and its chemical variability under differing conditions of formation. We use the Munali Ni sulfide deposit to test the use of magnetite as an indicator mineral. Magnetite from mafic, ultramafic, and magmatic sulfide lithologies in fresh rock at Munali show discernible differences in the most compatible elements (V, Ni, Cr). We propose a new Cr/V versus Ni discrimination diagram for magnetite that can be used to indicate fractionation of the parent magma (Cr/V increases from ultramafic to mafic), and the presence of co-existing sulfides (Ni contents >300 ppm). The signatures of these three elements at Munali are comparable to sulfide-related magnetites from other deposits, supporting the broad applicability of the discrimination diagram. Samples taken from overburden directly on top of the Munali deposit replicate signatures in the fresh bedrock, strongly advocating the use of magnetite as an exploration indicator mineral. Samples from areas without any geophysical or geochemical anomalies show weak mineralisation signatures, whereas magnetite samples taken from prospects with such anomalies display mineralisation signatures. Magnetite is a thus a viable geochemical indicator mineral for magmatic sulfide mineralisation in early stage exploration. [Display omitted] •Magnetite is an ideal geochemical indicator mineral for magmatic Ni-Cu-PGE sulfides.•Cr, V and Ni contents in detrital samples replicate bedrock signatures.•Cr/V ratios of magnetite indicate mafic versus ultramafic source.•Ni contents of magnetite >300 ppm indicate mineralised versus barren parent magmas.•New Cr/V versus Ni discrimination diagram proposed for magnetite indicator chemistry.