A test of the ADV-based Reynolds flux method for in situ estimation of sediment settling velocity in a muddy estuary

• Published in: Geo-marine letters Vol. 33; no. 6; pp. 477 - 484
• Main Authors: Cartwright, Grace M., Friedrichs, Carl T., Smith, S. Jarrell
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.12.2013; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Biofouling; Boundary layer; Boundary layers; Brackish; Earth and Environmental Science; Earth Sciences; Estuaries; Estuarine environments; Fluid mechanics; Geology; Marine; Original; Reynolds number; Sediment transport; Settling velocity; Suspended sediments; Suspended solids; Water column; USA, Virginia, York R; ANW, USA, Virginia; Pump Sample; Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter; Settling Velocity; Total Suspended Solid; Particle Tracking Velocimetry
• ISSN: 0276-0460; 1432-1157
• DOI: 10.1007/s00367-013-0340-4

Under conditions common in muddy coastal and estuarine environments, acoustic Doppler velocimeters (ADVs) can serve to estimate sediment settling velocity ( w s ) by assuming a balance between upward turbulent Reynolds flux and downward gravitational settling. Advantages of this method include simple instrument deployment, lack of flow disturbance, and relative insensitivity to biofouling and water column stratification. Although this method is being used with increasing frequency in coastal and estuarine environments, to date it has received little direct ground truthing. This study compared in situ estimates of w s inferred by a 5-MHz ADV to independent in situ observations from a high-definition video settling column over the course of a flood tide in the bottom boundary layer of the York River estuary, Virginia, USA. The ADV-based measurements were found to agree with those of the settling column when the current speed at about 40 cm above the bed was greater than about 20 cm/s. This corresponded to periods when the estimated magnitude of the settling term in the suspended sediment continuity equation was four or more times larger than the time rate of change of concentration. For ADV observations restricted to these conditions, ADV-based estimates of w s (mean 0.48±0.04 mm/s) were highly consistent with those observed by the settling column (mean 0.45±0.02 mm/s). However, the ADV-based method for estimating w s was sensitive to the prescribed concentration of the non-settling washload, C wash . In an objective operational definition, C wash can be set equal to the lowest suspended solids concentration observed around slack water.