Cross-correlation Coefficients for the Study of Repeating Earthquakes: An Investigation of Two Empirical Assumptions/Conventions in Seismological Interpretation Practice

For the identification and analysis of ‘repeating earthquakes,’ there are two empirical concepts. The first is the assumption that the cross-correlation coefficient of the filtered seismograms of closely spaced ‘repeaters’ depends exponentially on the inter-event separation distance. The second is t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPure and applied geophysics Vol. 171; no. 3-5; pp. 425 - 437
Main Authors Han, Libo, Wu, Zhongliang, Li, Yutong, Jiang, Changsheng
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Basel Springer Basel 01.03.2014
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:For the identification and analysis of ‘repeating earthquakes,’ there are two empirical concepts. The first is the assumption that the cross-correlation coefficient of the filtered seismograms of closely spaced ‘repeaters’ depends exponentially on the inter-event separation distance. The second is the convention that in processing regional seismograms, a 0.5–5.0-Hz band pass filter is used. In this article, using a simple layered structure model, we investigated the cross-correlation coefficient of the filtered synthetic seismograms of two closely located events, that is, a ‘doublet.’ We investigated the relation between the cross-correlation coefficient and the inter-event separation distance. Simulation shows that in the 0.5–5.0-Hz frequency band, even if for simple synthetic seismograms without considering lateral heterogeneity or scattering, the exponential dependence is only a first order approximation concept. To check the frequency dependence of the cross-correlation coefficient, we analyzed a group of seismograms of a ‘multiplet’ in Xiuyan, Liaoning, northeast China, recorded by the Regional Seismographic Network of Liaoning Province. The cross-correlation coefficients were observed to be relatively stable against frequency for the 0.5–5.0-Hz frequency band.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0033-4553
1420-9136
DOI:10.1007/s00024-012-0515-3