Impact of Structure, Coupling Scheme, and State of Interest on the Energy Transfer in CP29

• Published in: The journal of physical chemistry. B Vol. 127; no. 33; pp. 7207 - 7219
• Main Authors: Petry, S., Tremblay, J. C., Götze, J. P.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States American Chemical Society 24.08.2023
• Subjects: B: Biophysical and Biochemical Systems and Processes; Chemical Sciences; Chromophores; QM/MM; Fluorescence resonance energy transfer; Energy; Excited states
• ISSN: 1520-6106; 1520-5207
• DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c01012

The Qy and Bx excitation energy transfer (EET) in the minor light-harvesting complex CP29 (LHCII B4.1) antenna complex of Pisum sativum was characterized using a computational approach. We applied Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) and the transition density cube (TDC) method to estimate the Coulombic coupling, based on a combination of classical molecular dynamics and quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics calculations. Employing TDC instead of FRET mostly affects the EET between chlorophylls (Chls) and carotenoids (Crts), as expected due to the Crts being spatially more challenging for FRET. Only between Chls, effects are found to be small (about only 0.1 EET efficiency change when introducing TDC instead of FRET). Effects of structural sampling were found to be small, illustrated by a small average standard deviation for the Qy state coupling elements (FRET/TDC: 0.97/0.94 cm–1). Due to the higher flexibility of the Bx state, the corresponding deviations are larger (FRET/TDC between Chl–Chl pairs: 17.58/22.67 cm–1, between Crt–Chl pairs: 62.58/31.63 cm–1). In summary, it was found for the Q band that the coupling between Chls varies only slightly depending on FRET or TDC, resulting in a minute effect on EET acceptor preference. In contrast, the coupling in the B band spectral region is found to be more affected. Here, the S2 (1Bu ) states of the spatially challenging Crts may act as acceptors in addition to the B states of the Chls. Depending on FRET or TDC, several Chls show different Chl-to-Crt couplings. Interestingly, the EET between Chls or Crts in the B band is found to often outcompete the corresponding decay processes. The individual efficiencies for B band EET to Crts vary however strongly with the chosen coupling scheme (e.g., up to 0.29/0.99 FRET/TDC efficiency for the Chl a604/neoxanthin pair). Thus, the choice of the coupling scheme must involve a consideration of the state of interest.