Assessing models for prediction of some soil chemical properties from portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) spectrometry data in Brazilian Coastal Plains
Portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) spectrometry is becoming increasingly popular for predicting soil properties worldwide. However, there are still very few works on this subject under tropical conditions. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to use pXRF data to characterize the Brazilian Co...
Saved in:
Published in | Geoderma Vol. 357; p. 113957 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Elsevier B.V
01.01.2020
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) spectrometry is becoming increasingly popular for predicting soil properties worldwide. However, there are still very few works on this subject under tropical conditions. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to use pXRF data to characterize the Brazilian Coastal Plains (BCP) soils and assess four machine learning algorithms [ordinary least squares regression (OLS), cubist regression (CR), XGBoost (XGB), and random forest (RF)] for prediction of total nitrogen (TN), cation exchange capacity (CEC), and soil organic matter (SOM) using pXRF data. A total of 285 soil samples were collected from the A and B horizons representing Ultisols, Oxisols, Spodosols, and Entisols. The pXRF reported elements helped in the characterization of the BCP soils. In general, the RF model achieved the best performances for TN (R2 = 0.50), CEC (0.75), and SOM (0.56) when A and B horizons were combined, although better results have been reported in the literature for soils from other regions of the world. The results reported here for the BCP soils represent alternatives for reducing costs and time needed for assessing such data, supporting agronomic and environmental strategies.
•The elemental data provided by pXRF were used to characterize the BCP soils•Four different prediction algorithms were used to predict SOM, TN, and CEC•In general, RF algorithm outperformed OLS, XGBoost, and CR algorithms |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0016-7061 1872-6259 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.113957 |