Southern California Coastal Response to the 2015–2016 El Niño

Widespread erosion associated with energetic waves of the strong 2015–2016 El Niño on the U.S. West Coast has been reported widely. However, Southern California was often sheltered from the northerly approach direction of the offshore waves. The few large swells that reached Southern California were...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of geophysical research. Earth surface Vol. 123; no. 11; pp. 3069 - 3083
Main Authors Young, Adam P., Flick, Reinhard E., Gallien, Timu W., Giddings, Sarah N., Guza, R. T., Harvey, M., Lenain, Luc, Ludka, B. C., Melville, W. Kendall, O'Reilly, W. C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.11.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Widespread erosion associated with energetic waves of the strong 2015–2016 El Niño on the U.S. West Coast has been reported widely. However, Southern California was often sheltered from the northerly approach direction of the offshore waves. The few large swells that reached Southern California were not synchronous with the highest tides. Although west coast‐wide tidal anomalies were relatively large in 2015–2016, in Southern California, total water levels (sum of tides, anomalies, and wave superelevation) were lower than during the 1997–1998 Niño, and comparable to the 2009–2010 Niño. Airborne lidar surveys spanning 300 km of Southern California coast show the beach response varied from considerable erosion to accretion. On average, the shoreline moved landward 10 m, similar to the 2009–2010 El Niño. Some San Diego county beaches were narrower in the 1997–1998 El Niño than in 2015–2016, consistent with the higher erosion potential in 1997–1998. Beach retreat exceeded 80 m at a few locations. However, 27% of the shoreline accreted, often in pocket beaches, or near jetties. While adjacent beaches eroded, estuary mouths accreted slightly, and several estuaries remained or became closed during the study period. Only 12% of cliffs eroded (mostly at the base), and the average cliff face retreat was markedly less than historical values. Only two cliff‐top areas retreated significantly. Although some areas experienced significant change, the potential for coastal erosion and damage in Southern California was reduced compared to the 1997–1998 El Niño, because of low rainfall, a northerly swell approach, and relatively limited total high‐water levels. Key Points Southern California beach response to the 2015–2016 El Niño varied widely, from considerable erosion to accretion Some coastal erosion and damage were limited by the timing of high tides and large waves, northerly swell direction, and low rainfall Estuary mouths on average accreted, while their adjacent beaches eroded. Many estuaries remained or became closed during the study
ISSN:2169-9003
2169-9011
DOI:10.1029/2018JF004771