A systematic approach to assessing the sensitivity and vulnerability of water availability to climate change in Europe

Making use of ensemble climate modeling systems and multimodel simulations of climate projections calls for a systematic approach in impact studies. In this study the response surface method is introduced to systematically, consistently, and objectively examine impacts of climate change on water ava...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWater resources research Vol. 47; no. 2
Main Authors Weiß, Martina, Alcamo, Joseph
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.02.2011
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0043-1397
1944-7973
DOI10.1029/2009WR008516

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Making use of ensemble climate modeling systems and multimodel simulations of climate projections calls for a systematic approach in impact studies. In this study the response surface method is introduced to systematically, consistently, and objectively examine impacts of climate change on water availability, subject to selected impact thresholds. The response surface hereby represents the sensitivity of water availability to a broad range of possible climatic change, onto which vulnerability thresholds are superimposed. Their exceedance is assessed by additionally superimposing climate change projections onto the surface. With this method, 18 European river basins are ranked according to their sensitivity to climate change (analyzing the response surface itself). The use of climate change projections from six regional climate models for the year 2100 under the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change A1B emissions scenario in combination with societal vulnerability thresholds then enables a vulnerability ranking of these basins. Overall, a strong climate sensitivity of the Nordic basins is found on the basis of their mainly snow‐dominated flow regime. When looking at the vulnerability, however, southern European basins together with some central European basins are highest in the ranking because of the violation of both low flow and water stress thresholds.
Bibliography:ArticleID:2009WR008516
istex:2B88DDBAABD068DEAD9C763CDE735AC7E27C21A4
ark:/67375/WNG-R6NXFM9F-W
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ISSN:0043-1397
1944-7973
DOI:10.1029/2009WR008516