How Much Electron Donation Is There In Transition Metal Complexes? A Computational Study

The “dative” covalent interactions between metals and ligands in coordination compounds, i.e., metal-to-ligand and ligand-to-metal donation, are manifestations of electron delocalization and subject to errors in approximate calculations. This work addresses the extent of dative bonding/donation in a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of chemical theory and computation Vol. 20; no. 12; pp. 4965 - 4976
Main Authors Obeng, Augustine, Autschbach, Jochen
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Chemical Society 25.06.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The “dative” covalent interactions between metals and ligands in coordination compounds, i.e., metal-to-ligand and ligand-to-metal donation, are manifestations of electron delocalization and subject to errors in approximate calculations. This work addresses the extent of dative bonding/donation in a series of closed-shell transition metal complexes. Several Kohn–Sham density functionals, representing different “rungs” of approximations, along with post-Hartree–Fock methods are assessed in comparison to CCSD­(T). Two widely used nonhybrid and global hybrid density functionals (B3LYP, PBE0) tend to produce notably too strong donation. Global hybrids with elevated fractions of exact exchange (40 to 50%) and the range-separated exchange functional CAM-B3LYP tend to perform better for the description of the donation. The performance of a double-hybrid functional is found to be quite satisfactory, correcting errors seen in MP2 calculations. A fast approximate coupled-cluster model (DLPNO-CCSD) also gives a reasonable description of the donation, with a tendency to underestimate its extent.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1549-9618
1549-9626
1549-9626
DOI:10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00404