Selectivity in the Self-Assembly of Organometallic Gold(I) Rings and [2]Catenanes

• Published in: Organometallics Vol. 24; no. 21; pp. 5004 - 5014
• Main Authors: Habermehl, Nicolle C, Jennings, Michael C, McArdle, Christopher P, Mohr, Fabian, Puddephatt, Richard J
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: American Chemical Society 10.10.2005
• ISSN: 0276-7333; 1520-6041
• DOI: 10.1021/om050588o

The selectivity of formation of organometallic rings or [2]catenanes [{X(4-C6H4OCH2C⋮CAu)2(μ-Ph2PZPPh2)} n ], n =1 or 2, respectively, has been studied as a function of the hinge group X and the diphosphine ligand [X = O, S, SO2, CH2, CMe2, CPh2, C(CF3)2, C6H10; Z = (CH2) m with m = 2−5]. When Z = (CH2)3, mixing of pairs of compounds with different C 2 v -symmetrical hinge groups (X, X‘ = SO2, CH2, CMe2, CPh2, C(CF3)2, C6H10) led to formation of an equilibrium mixture containing the unsymmetrical [2]catenanes [{X(4-C6H4OCH2C⋮CAu)2(μ-Ph2PZPPh2)}{X‘(4-C6H4OCH2C⋮CAu)2(μ-Ph2PZPPh2)], as identified by NMR spectroscopy. The complexes with Z = (CH2)4 exist in solution predominantly as the macrocycles and so do not form analogous mixed diacetylide complexes. When the hinge group contained a prochiral carbon center (X = CHMe, CMePh, 1,1-indanylidene), only achiral macrocycles [X(4-C6H4OCH2C⋮CAu)2(μ-Ph2PZPPh2)] were formed in solution when Z = (CH2)4, but mixtures containing both achiral macrocycles and chiral [2]catenane were formed when Z = (CH2)3. In several cases, the solid-state structures of the isolated complexes were not representative of the structures in solution, with macrocycles being dominant in solution and [2]catenanes formed preferentially during crystallization.