Effect of spatial variability of engineering properties on stability of a CSMC embankment

Cement-stabilized marine clay (CSMC), usually used as filling material of coastal facilities such as land reclamation embankments, shows very high spatial variability in engineering properties. This high spatial variability produces substantial influence on the stability of CSMC embankments. In this...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMarine georesources & geotechnology Vol. 36; no. 1; pp. 91 - 99
Main Authors Zhang, Rong-Jun, Hasan, Mohammed Shareef M. S., Zheng, Jun-Jie, Cheng, Yu-Shi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Philadelphia Taylor & Francis 02.01.2018
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Cement
Clay
Coefficient of variation
Concrete
Design
embankment
Embankment stability
Embankments
Land reclamation
marine clay
Marine engineering
Mathematical analysis
Probability theory
Properties
Properties (attributes)
Safety factors
Spatial distribution
spatial variability
Spatial variations
Stability
Statistical analysis
Variability
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Cement-stabilized marine clay (CSMC), usually used as filling material of coastal facilities such as land reclamation embankments, shows very high spatial variability in engineering properties. This high spatial variability produces substantial influence on the stability of CSMC embankments. In this study, the experimental data collected from an actual project were first analyzed to identify the statistical characteristics of the engineering properties of in situ CSMC. It is shown that the strength of the in situ CSMC follows a lognormal distribution, and the coefficient of variation (COV) is higher than the value (0.35) assumed in the conventional deterministic design method (CDDM). Both deterministic and random numerical analyses were then performed for a typical CSMC embankment. Special attention was paid to evaluate the effects of COV and the mean value of strength on the embankment stability. Results show that the effect of spatial variability is significant but not reasonably accounted for in situ CDDM. This leads to unsafe design when COV >0.35. It is recommended that a larger global safety factor should be chosen for a higher COV to guarantee a target failure probability in future design.
ISSN:1064-119X
1521-0618
DOI:10.1080/1064119X.2017.1290168