The relationship between closure pressures from fluid injection tests and the minimum principal stress in strong rocks

• Published in: International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences (Oxford, England : 1997) Vol. 44; no. 5; pp. 787 - 801
• Main Authors: Nelson, Emma J., Chipperfield, Simon T., Hillis, Richard R., Gilbert, John, McGowen, Jim, Mildren, Scott D.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.07.2007; Elsevier Science
• Subjects: Applied sciences; Buildings. Public works; Closure pressure; Exact sciences and technology; Geotechnics; In situ stress; Mini-frac injection test; Soil investigations. Testing; Soil mechanics. Rocks mechanics; Australia; Oceania; Closure pressure; Mini-frac injection test; In situ stress; Oil industry; Rock mechanics; Site analysis; Principal stress; Fluid injection; Structure; Tensile strength
• ISSN: 1365-1609; 1873-4545
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.10.004

Closure pressures measured during injection tests such as mini-fracs are normally considered an accurate measure of the minimum in situ principal stress magnitude. This paper presents stress, strength and image log data from the Australian Cooper Basin, which suggests that in reservoirs with high in situ stress, high tensile strength and weak geological fabrics, interpreted closure pressures may be significantly greater than the minimum principal stress. Closure pressures interpreted from mini-frac injection tests in the Cooper Basin, suggest the minimum principal stress varies from 12.4–27.2 MPa/km (0.55–1.2 psi/ft). To better understand the reasons for this variation in closure pressure, image logs and mini-frac data from 13 treatment zones, and core from seven of these treatment zones, were analysed. The analysis revealed that treatment zones with high measured closure pressures (⩾18.1 MPa/km; 0.8 psi/ft), high treating pressures (>31.6 MPa/km; 1.4 psi/ft) and high measured hydraulic fracture complexity existed in reservoirs with high tensile rock strength (>7 MPa; 1015 psi) and geological fabrics (planes of weakness) including natural fractures. Conversely, treatment zones with lower measured closure stress (⩽19 MPa/km; 0.84 psi/ft) and low hydraulic fracture complexity occurred in reservoirs with lower tensile strength and/or no geological fabrics. We suggest that closure pressures in rocks with high tensile strength and weak geological fabrics may not be representative of the minimum principal stress magnitude in the Cooper Basin where they are associated with hydraulic fracture complexity. Rather, they reflect the normal stress incident on pre-existing weaknesses that are exploited by hydraulic fluid during the mini-frac injection.