Freefall, Self-Efficacy, and Leading in Dangerous Contexts

We examined whether completion of a military Freefall parachuting program enhanced self-efficacy in the domains of leader self-control and leader assertiveness. The Freefall program was particularly suited for self-efficacy development because Freefall required personal mastery to overcome a substan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMilitary psychology Vol. 22; no. S1; pp. S117 - S136
Main Authors Samuels, Steven M, Foster, Craig A, Lindsay, Douglas R
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington Taylor & Francis 2010
Taylor & Francis Group
Taylor & Francis Ltd
SeriesLeadership in military and other dangerous contexts
Subjects
Leadership
Military training
Parachuting
Psychological aspects
Self control
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:We examined whether completion of a military Freefall parachuting program enhanced self-efficacy in the domains of leader self-control and leader assertiveness. The Freefall program was particularly suited for self-efficacy development because Freefall required personal mastery to overcome a substantial perceived risk. We surveyed participants at the beginning and end of the Freefall program. We also distributed a subsequent survey nine months later that allowed us to compare leader self-efficacy as a function of participation in Freefall and a similarly risky but less mastery-oriented Soaring program (i.e., flying gliders). The obtained results indicated that successful performance in Freefall, but not in Soaring, contributed to leader self-control and leader assertiveness. The implications for leading in dangerous and traditional contexts are discussed.
ISSN:0899-5605
1532-7876
DOI:10.1080/08995601003644379