The Heligoland Glacitectonic Complex in the southeastern North Sea: indicators of a pre‐ or early‐Elsterian ice margin

Glacial landforms are abundant in the North Sea basin and are often used to reconstruct the impact and dynamics of ice sheets during the Pleistocene. Geophysical methods have allowed the mapping and structural analysis of glacial landforms at the surface and in the subsurface to estimate the positio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBoreas Vol. 51; no. 1; pp. 100 - 117
Main Authors Lohrberg, Arne, Krastel, Sebastian, Unverricht, Daniel, Schwarzer, Klaus
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Aarhus John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.01.2022
Subjects
Deformation
Geological faults
Geophysical exploration
Geophysical methods
Glacial periods
Glaciation
Ice
Ice formation
Ice sheets
Landforms
Pleistocene
Pliocene
Restoration
Sediments
Seismic data
Seismic surveys
Seismological data
Structural analysis
Thrust faults
Valleys
North Sea
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Glacial landforms are abundant in the North Sea basin and are often used to reconstruct the impact and dynamics of ice sheets during the Pleistocene. Geophysical methods have allowed the mapping and structural analysis of glacial landforms at the surface and in the subsurface to estimate the position of former ice margins in the North Sea. However, the glacial history of the southeastern North Sea remains underexplored. In this study, we present a structural analysis of Late Pliocene to Late Pleistocene sediments based on a dense grid of 2D high‐resolution multi‐channel reflection seismic data from the German sector of the southeastern North Sea. We show that the Heligoland Glacitectonic Complex (HGC) is larger than previously assumed (700 km2, 32×22 km) and characterized by three distinct zones of thrusting and deformation on two décollements. The kinematic restoration of seismic cross‐sections and dip measurements of thrust faults demonstrate that the HGC was formed by an ice lobe advancing from the southeast. To explain the origin of the HGC, we provide alternative models for its formation during a single ice advance or two ice advances in the study area. Furthermore, we validate the early or pre‐Elsterian age of the HGC based on nearby Elsterian tunnel valleys, and conclude that salt structures in the subsurface may have influenced its location.
ISSN:0300-9483
1502-3885
DOI:10.1111/bor.12551