Are open fractures necessarily aligned with maximum horizontal stress?

• Published in: Earth and planetary science letters Vol. 222; no. 1; pp. 191 - 195
• Main Authors: Laubach, Stephen E, Olson, Jon E, Gale, Julia F.W
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 15.05.2004
• Subjects: diagenesis; fluid flow; fractures; hydrocarbons; shear wave anisotropy; stress; diagenesis; stress; fluid flow; hydrocarbons; fractures; shear wave anisotropy
• ISSN: 0012-821X; 1385-013X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2004.02.019

Fluid flow in fractured rock is an increasingly central issue in recovering water and hydrocarbon supplies and geothermal energy, in predicting flow of pollutants underground, in engineering structures, and in understanding large-scale crustal behaviour. Conventional wisdom assumes that fluids prefer to flow along fractures oriented parallel or nearly parallel to modern-day maximum horizontal compressive stress, or S Hmax. The reasoning is that these fractures have the lowest normal stresses across them and therefore provide the least resistance to flow. For example, this view governs how geophysicists design and interpret seismic experiments to probe fracture fluid pathways in the deep subsurface. Contrary to these widely held views, here we use core, stress measurement, and fluid flow data to show that S Hmax does not necessarily coincide with the direction of open natural fractures in the subsurface (>3 km depth). Consequently, in situ stress direction cannot be considered to predict or control the direction of maximum permeability in rock. Where effective stress is compressive and fractures are expected to be closed, chemical alteration dictates location of open conduits, either preserving or destroying fracture flow pathways no matter their orientation.