Innocence in the shadow of COVID-19: Plea decision making during a pandemic

Over 95% of criminal convictions in the United States are the result of guilty pleas. Consequently, it is critical that we ensure the process of pleading guilty is as free of coercion as possible. Yet, research has indicated that incarcerating defendants to await trial could have an undue influence...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of experimental psychology. Applied Vol. 27; no. 4; p. 739
Main Authors Wilford, Miko M, Zimmerman, David M, Yan, Shi, Sutherland, Kelly T
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.12.2021
Subjects
Computer Simulation
COVID-19
Criminal Law
Decision Making
Humans
Pandemics
SARS-CoV-2
United States
United States
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

More Information
Summary:Over 95% of criminal convictions in the United States are the result of guilty pleas. Consequently, it is critical that we ensure the process of pleading guilty is as free of coercion as possible. Yet, research has indicated that incarcerating defendants to await trial could have an undue influence on their decision to plead guilty. The current research employed a novel computer simulation to examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on plea decision making among the innocent and the guilty when faced with potential pretrial detention. While presenting COVID-related information to participants increased both true and false guilty pleas, further analyses indicated that concerns about COVID-19 weighed more heavily on the innocent than the guilty. These findings illustrate the negative impact a pandemic could have in combination with a system of pleas that often allows prosecutors to provide defendants with just one guaranteed respite from jail-a guilty plea. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
ISSN:1939-2192
DOI:10.1037/xap0000367