Synthesis, Structures, and DFT Bonding Analysis of New Titanium Hydrazido(2−) Complexes

The reaction of 1,1-diphenylhydrazine with Ti(NMe2)2Cl2 produced the monomeric terminal titanium hydrazido(2−) species Ti(NNPh2)Cl2(HNMe2)2 (1) in near-quantitative yield. The reaction of Ti(NMe2)2Cl2 with the less sterically demanding ligand precursors 1,1-dimethylhydrazine or N-aminopiperidine gav...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInorganic chemistry Vol. 44; no. 23; pp. 8442 - 8458
Main Authors Parsons, Thomas B, Hazari, Nilay, Cowley, Andrew R, Green, Jennifer C, Mountford, Philip
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Chemical Society 14.11.2005
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The reaction of 1,1-diphenylhydrazine with Ti(NMe2)2Cl2 produced the monomeric terminal titanium hydrazido(2−) species Ti(NNPh2)Cl2(HNMe2)2 (1) in near-quantitative yield. The reaction of Ti(NMe2)2Cl2 with the less sterically demanding ligand precursors 1,1-dimethylhydrazine or N-aminopiperidine gave the dimeric μ-η2,η1-bridged compounds Ti2(μ-η2,η1-NNMe2)2Cl4(HNMe2)2 (2) and Ti2{μ-η2,η1-NN(CH2)5}2Cl4(HNMe2)3 (3). The X-ray structures of 2 and 3 showed the formation of N−H···Cl hydrogen bonded dimers or chains, respectively. The reaction of 1 with an excess of pyridine formed [Ti(NNPh2)Cl2(py)2] n (4, n = 1 or 2). The reaction of the tert-butyl imido complex Ti(NtBu)Cl2(py)3 with either 1,1-dimethylhydrazine or N-aminopiperidine again resulted in the formation of hydrazido-bridged dimeric complexes, namely Ti2(μ-η2,η1-NNMe2)2Cl4(py)2 (5, structurally characterized) and Ti2{μ-η2,η1-NN(CH2)5}2Cl4(py)2 (6). Compounds 1 and 4 are potential new entry points into terminal hydrazido(2−) chemistry of titanium. Compound 1 reacted with neutral fac-N3 donor ligands to form Ti(NNPh2)Cl2(Me3[9]aneN3) (7), Ti(NNPh2)Cl2(Me3[6]aneN3) (8), Ti(NNPh2)Cl2{HC(Me2pz)3} (9, structurally characterized), and Ti(NNPh2)Cl2{HC( n Bupz)3} (10) in good yields (Me3[9]aneN3 = trimethyl-1,4,7-triazacyclononane, Me3[6]aneN3 = trimethyl-1,3,5-triazacyclohexane, HC(Me2pz)3 = tris(3,5-dimethylpyrazolyl)methane, and HC( n Bupz)3 = tris(4- n butylpyrazolyl)methane). DFT calculations were performed on both the model terminal hydrazido compound Ti(NNPh2)Cl2{HC(pz)3} (I) and the corresponding imido compounds Ti(NMe)Cl2{HC(pz)3} (II) and Ti(NPh)Cl2{HC(pz)3} (III). The NNPh2 ligand binds to the metal center in an analogous manner to that of terminal imido ligands (metal⋮ligand triple bond), but with one of the TiNα π components significantly destabilized by a π* interaction with the lone pair of the Nβ atom. The NR ligand σ donor ability was found to be NMe > NPh > NNPh2, whereas the overall (σ + π) donor ability is NMe > NNPh2 > NPh, as judged by fragment orbital populations, Ti−N atom−atom overlap populations, and fragment-charge analysis. DFT calculations on the hydrazido ligand in a μ-η2,η1-bridging mode showed involvement of the NN π electrons in donation to one of the Ti centers. This TiN2 interaction is best represented as a metallocycle.
Bibliography:istex:737739B21B29E669EEAACC7B3A2EF8FC9692D4C8
ark:/67375/TPS-SP8C3929-V
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0020-1669
1520-510X
DOI:10.1021/ic051271j