Structural Performance of Glued Laminated Bamboo Beams

AbstractThis paper presents a study aimed to characterize the structural performance of laminated bamboo lumber (LBL) and bamboo glulam beams (BGBs) as a first step to evaluate their potential application as a structural material. LBL was tested to determine their flexural, tensile, and shear proper...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.) Vol. 140; no. 1
Main Authors Sinha, Arijit, Way, Daniel, Mlasko, Skyler
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published American Society of Civil Engineers 01.01.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:AbstractThis paper presents a study aimed to characterize the structural performance of laminated bamboo lumber (LBL) and bamboo glulam beams (BGBs) as a first step to evaluate their potential application as a structural material. LBL was tested to determine their flexural, tensile, and shear properties, whereas BGBs were tested for their flexural, shear, and compressive properties. The BGBs were fabricated using two different adhesives: isocyanate resin (ISO) and phenol-resorcinol formaldehyde (PRF). BGBs with ISO performed better in bending strength, whereas the stiffness of glulams with both glue types was equivalent. Irrespective of the glue type, failure modes and shear test data showed BGB bending strength was limited by interlaminar shear in the LBL used in BGB fabrication. From the experimental study, it is concluded that the LBL does possess higher allowable and average strength values in tension and bending and comparable stiffness values, with much less variability to a commonly used structural species of wood, Douglas fir. The potential of using LBL in framing applications exists. However, certain impediments need to be addressed and researched before acceptance of LBL and BGB in the construction marketplace.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0733-9445
1943-541X
DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000807