Effect of Surfactants on Eliminating Stable Ultrafine Chalcopyrite Froth

• Published in: ACS omega Vol. 9; no. 36; pp. 38088 - 38095
• Main Authors: Xu, Shaomei, Lu, Xiangyu, Dai, Zhifei, Li, Shuai, Xiao, Gang, Huai, Yangyang
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States American Chemical Society 10.09.2024
• ISSN: 2470-1343; 2470-1343
• DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.4c05225

Chalcopyrite is a primary source of copper in nature. However, with the increasing need to process low-grade and complex chalcopyrite ores, overly stable froth is becoming more and more common and poses operational and safety challenges. No reliable strategy has been developed to address the issue. As a new initiative, this study investigated three different structured surfactants, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate (SDBS), and pentadecafluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), which vary in hydrophobic group, aiming to modify the surfaces of ultrafine chalcopyrite particles and adjust the interfacial tension at the gas–liquid interface to eliminate stable ultrafine chalcopyrite froth. The fundamental hypothesis was that an ideal surfactant structure could adjust the particle surface wettability and interfacial tension to eliminate overly stable froth. Based on contact angle measurements and interfacial tension measurements using a Theta Flow tensiometer by the pendant drop method and the sessile drop method, it was demonstrated that the contact angle played a dominant role in defoaming, while the reduction of gas–liquid interfacial tension had an adverse effect. Additionally, defoaming tests indicated that SDBS had lower defoaming effectiveness than SDS at low surfactant concentrations due to the steric hindrance in its structure, whereas the addition of SDBS could achieve a froth reduction efficiency as high as 93.75% at higher surfactant concentrations due to its stronger hydrophobicity and adsorption capacity to chalcopyrite particles, which could reduce the contact angle from 70 to 37.62°. However, PFOA exhibited lower defoaming effectiveness than both SDS and SDBS due to its lipophobic fluorocarbon tail of PFOA and weaker adsorption capacity to chalcopyrite particles, making it unsuitable for eliminating stable ultrafine chalcopyrite froth.