Reduction Factor for the Unloading Point Method at Clay Soil Sites

Full-scale testing can be an integral component of quality control/quality assurance for projects involving construction of deep foundations. Rapid load tests are being used in the deep foundation industry as a method for assessing the axial static behavior of deep foundations. Since rapid load test...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering Vol. 136; no. 4; pp. 643 - 646
Main Authors Weaver, Thomas J, Rollins, Kyle M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Reston, VA American Society of Civil Engineers 01.04.2010
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Full-scale testing can be an integral component of quality control/quality assurance for projects involving construction of deep foundations. Rapid load tests are being used in the deep foundation industry as a method for assessing the axial static behavior of deep foundations. Since rapid load tests involve dynamics, inertial and damping forces must be considered in analyzing measured pile response to estimate the static pile response. The unloading point method (UPM) is typically used for this purpose. Generally considered a consequence of load rate effects in clays, results from the UPM must be further modified by a reduction factor to obtain a reasonable estimate of the static pile response. A reduction factor of 0.65 applied to the UPM for clay soil sites has been recommended by others. However, a review and analysis of readily available literature reporting static and rapid pile load test results at sites predominantly consisting of clay soils indicate that an average reduction factor of 0.47 is more appropriate. Rapid load testing should be used judiciously. When using the UPM to estimate static pile capacity from rapid load tests in clay, static load tests should be performed to validate the reduction factor used to interpret rapid load tests.
ISSN:1090-0241
1943-5606
DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000262