Relationships between porphyry Cu–Mo mineralization in the Jinshajiang–Red River metallogenic belt and tectonic activity: Constraints from zircon U–Pb and molybdenite Re–Os geochronology

The Jinshajiang–Red River porphyry Cu–Mo metallogenic belt is an important Cenozoic porphyry Cu–Mo mineralization concentrating zone in the eastern Indo‐Asian collision zone. New zircon U–Pb and molybdenite Re–Os ages and compilation of previously published ages indicate that porphyry Cu–Mo deposits...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOre geology reviews Vol. 48; pp. 460 - 473
Main Authors Xu, Leiluo, Bi, Xianwu, Hu, Ruizhong, Zhang, Xingchun, Su, Wenchao, Qu, Wenjun, Hu, Zhaochu, Tang, Yongyong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 01.10.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The Jinshajiang–Red River porphyry Cu–Mo metallogenic belt is an important Cenozoic porphyry Cu–Mo mineralization concentrating zone in the eastern Indo‐Asian collision zone. New zircon U–Pb and molybdenite Re–Os ages and compilation of previously published ages indicate that porphyry Cu–Mo deposits in the belt did not form at the same time, i.e., the porphyry emplacement and relevant Cu–Mo mineralization ages of the Ailaoshan–Red River ore belt in south range from 36.3Ma to 34.6Ma, and from 36.0Ma to 33.9Ma, respectively, which are obviously younger than the porphyry emplacement ages of 43.8–36.9Ma and the relevant Cu–Mo mineralization ages of 41.6–35.8Ma of the Yulong ore belt in north. Tectonic studies indicated that the Jinshajiang fault system in north and Ailaoshan–Red River fault system in south of the Jinsjiang–Red river belt had different strike-slip patterns and ages. The right-lateral strike-slip motion of the Jinshajiang fault system initiated at ca. 43Ma with corresponding formation of the Yulong porphyry Cu–Mo system, whereas the left-lateral strike-slip motion of the Ailaoshan–Red River fault system initiated at ca. 36Ma with corresponding formation of the Ailaoshan–Red River porphyry Cu–Mo system. Therefore, the different ages of porphyry Cu–Mo systems, between in north and south of the Jinshajiang–Red River belt, indicate that the porphyry Cu–Mo mineralization is closely related to the divergent strike-slip movements between the Jinshajiang and Ailaoshan–Red River strike-slip faulting resulted from the Indo‐Asian collision. The tanslithospheric Jinshajiang–Red River faulting caused partial melting of the enriched mantle sources of alkali-rich porphyries by depressurization or/and asthenospheric heating, and facilitated the migration of alkali-rich magmas and the corresponding formation of alkali-rich porphyries and relevant Cu–Mo deposits in the belt.
ISSN:0169-1368
1872-7360
DOI:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2012.05.010