Textural and chemical variations of magnetite from porphyry Cu-Au and Cu skarn deposits in the Zhongdian region, northwestern Yunnan, SW China

[Display omitted] •Two kinds of magnetite are identified at porphyry-related deposits in the Zhongdian region.•Some magnetite grains had undergone dissolution-reprecipitation processes.•The compositions of magnetite are affected by temperature, oxygen fugacity and hydrothermal alteration. The Zhongd...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOre geology reviews Vol. 116; p. 103245
Main Authors Guo, Jian-Heng, Leng, Cheng-Biao, Zhang, Xing-Chun, Zafar, Tehseen, Chen, Wei Terry, Zhang, Wei, Tian, Zhen-Dong, Tian, Feng, Lai, Chun-Kit
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 01.01.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:[Display omitted] •Two kinds of magnetite are identified at porphyry-related deposits in the Zhongdian region.•Some magnetite grains had undergone dissolution-reprecipitation processes.•The compositions of magnetite are affected by temperature, oxygen fugacity and hydrothermal alteration. The Zhongdian region in northwestern Yunnan (SW China) hosts a number of important porphyry and skarn deposits. In this study, we integrate petrographic observations, SEM-EDS elemental mapping, EPMA and LA-ICP-MS geochemical analyses on magnetite from several key deposits in the region. Magnetite grains from the Pulang porphyry Cu-Au, Lannitang porphyry Au-Cu, Langdu Cu skarn, Disuga porphyry, and andesite of Tumugou Formation were analyzed to unravel the magnetite formation mechanism, and the relative oxygen fugacity of the porphyry/skarn ore-related hydrothermal fluids in this region. Two types of magnetites (Magnetite I and II) have been identified. Magnetite I is commonly distributed in the chlorite and/or sericite alteration zone(s). Magnetite I grains are characterized by being textually inhomogeneous. The Magnetite I core (with local ilmenite exsolution lamellae) is Ti-Cr rich, indicative of a dominantly igneous origin. The Magnetite I core and its surrounding primary igneous minerals (biotite, amphibole and plagioclase) underwent late alteration. Magnetite I grains are characterized by core-rim texture, sharp core-rim contact, and irregular grain boundaries. These textural features indicate that Magnetite I may have undergone dissolution-reprecipitation processes, during which the Magnetite I core was chemically purified via losing Ti and gaining Fe. Magnetite II (in potassic and sericite alteration zones) is textually homogeneous with relatively low contents of Ti, Mg, Al, V, Ni, and Mn. We suggest that Magnetite II was formed by hydrothermal alteration. Compared to Magnetite II grains from the Pulang and Langdu deposits, those from the Lannitang deposit have lower Mn and V but higher Sn contents, indicative of higher oxygen fugacity of the hydrothermal fluids. We propose that binary plots such as Ti vs. Sc, V vs. Sn and Ga vs. Sn can distinguish the different origins of magnetites. From an exploration perspective, Magnetite II from the altered Disuga porphyries has similar texture and composition to its counterpart from the potassic-altered Pulang porphyries. This, together with the presence of Cu-sulfide inclusions in the Disuga Magnetite I, suggests significant mineralization potential in these porphyries.
ISSN:0169-1368
1872-7360
DOI:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2019.103245