The Structure and Cl–O Dissociation Energy of the ClOO Radical: Finally, the Right Answers for the Right Reason

The chlorine peroxy radical (ClOO) has historically been a highly problematic system for theoretical studies. In particular, the erratic ab initio predictions of the Cl–O bond length reported in the literature thus far exhibit unacceptable errors with respect to the experimental structure. In light...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe journal of physical chemistry. A, Molecules, spectroscopy, kinetics, environment, & general theory Vol. 122; no. 9; pp. 2604 - 2610
Main Authors Abbott, Adam S, Schaefer, Henry F
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Chemical Society 08.03.2018
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The chlorine peroxy radical (ClOO) has historically been a highly problematic system for theoretical studies. In particular, the erratic ab initio predictions of the Cl–O bond length reported in the literature thus far exhibit unacceptable errors with respect to the experimental structure. In light of the widespread disagreement observed, we present a careful and systematic investigation of the ClOO geometry toward the basis set and correlation limits of single reference ab initio theory, employing the cc-pVXZ (X = D, T, Q, 5, 6) basis sets extrapolated to the complete basis set limit and coupled cluster theory through single, double, triple, and perturbative quadruple excitations [CCSDT­(Q)]. We demonstrate a considerable sensitivity of the Cl–O bond length to both electron correlation and basis set size. The CCSDT­(Q)/CBS structure is found to be r e(ClO) = 2.082, r e(OO) = 1.208, and θe(ClOO) = 115.4°, in remarkable agreement with Endo’s semi-experimentally determined values r e(ClO) = 2.084(1), r e(OO) = 1.206(2), and θe(ClOO) = 115.4(1)°. Moreover, we compute a Cl–O bond dissociation energy of 4.77 kcal mol–1, which is likewise in excellent agreement with the most recent experimental value of 4.69 ± 0.10 kcal mol–1.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1089-5639
1520-5215
DOI:10.1021/acs.jpca.8b00394