Characterization of the water retention curves of Everglades wetland soils

• Published in: Geoderma Vol. 381; p. 114724
• Main Authors: John, Anupama, Fuentes, Hector R., George, Florence
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 01.01.2021
• Subjects: Everglades peat; Marl; Vadose zone; van Genuchten model; Water retention curves; Water retention curves; van Genuchten model; Marl; Vadose zone; Everglades peat
• ISSN: 0016-7061; 1872-6259
• DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114724

•Marl is less susceptible to shrinkage and has higher volumetric water contents than peat.•Northern marsh peats, more fibric than southern marsh, have steeper retention curve.•Shrinkage significantly affects the soil water retention curve parameters.•Shrinkage decreases the slope of the retention curve.•Abrupt changes in soil volume cause deviations from typical retention curve behavior. Alterations to the natural hydrology of wetlands like the Everglades have increased the presence of unsaturated zones in typically inundated soil environments. Understanding soil moisture dynamics through numerical modeling requires a large dataset of soil hydraulic parameters (SHPs) due to the spatially variable nature of hydromorphic soils typically found in wetlands. Furthermore, the application of conventional parameterization models is challenging due to shrinkage with desaturation observed in these organic-rich soils. The objective of this work was to investigate water retention, shrinkage, and the effect of shrinkage on the SHPs of Everglades soils. This study used pressure plate extractors to determine the soil water retention curves (SWRCs) and corresponding shrinkage from triplicates for 53 sites across the Everglades. In addition, the organic content (OC), and fiber content (FC) were measured in the laboratory. An agglomerative clustering method applied to the retention and shrinkage data identified three distinct clusters: marl, mixed marl-peat and peat. Marl had higher volumetric water contents (VWCs) than marl-peat or peat particularly at higher pressures. The susceptibility of peat to shrinkage resulted in lower VWCs compared to the other two soils. When shrinkage was accounted for in the vGM model, a significantly higher α and lower n were observed. In addition, some deviations from typical SWRC behavior, attributed to the collapse of macro-pores, caused poor model fit. Northern marshes with predominantly fibric peat had steeper SWRCs due to the inverse relationship between FC and VWC at higher pressures. Further work is required to determine the influence of vegetation on the SWRC.