Geochronology, geochemistry and Sr–Nd–Pb isotopic constraints on the origin of the Qian’echong porphyry Mo deposit, Dabie orogen, east China

•The magmatism and mineralization in the deposit took place during ∼130–128Ma.•The source regions are not the NCC lower crust but might be the YC lower crust.•The source rocks were UHP eclogites with some Paleoproterozoic–Archean YC rocks.•The delamination had not taken place beneath the Qian’echong...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Asian earth sciences Vol. 85; pp. 163 - 177
Main Authors Gao, Yang, Mao, Jingwen, Ye, Huishou, Li, Faling, Li, Yongfeng, Luo, Zhengzhuan, Xiong, Bikang, Meng, Fang
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.05.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•The magmatism and mineralization in the deposit took place during ∼130–128Ma.•The source regions are not the NCC lower crust but might be the YC lower crust.•The source rocks were UHP eclogites with some Paleoproterozoic–Archean YC rocks.•The delamination had not taken place beneath the Qian’echong deposit when it formed. The giant Qian’echong porphyry molybdenum deposit is located in the Dabie orogen, east China. The molybdenum mineralization mainly occurs as molybdenite-bearing quartz veins hosted by the Devonian Nanwan Formation in the external contact zone of the Qian’echong stock. The Qian’echong stock comprises an earlier formed monzogranite and a later formed granite porphyry. Sensitive high-resolution ion microprobe (SHRIMP) zircon U–Pb dating constrains the timing of crystallization of the monzogranite and granite porphyry to 130±2 and 129±2Ma, respectively. The Re–Os model ages of six molybdenite samples range from 127.9±1.9 to 129.7±1.9Ma with an isochron age of 129.4±1.5Ma, which are all consistent within errors with the zircon U–Pb ages, indicating an Early Cretaceous magmatic and mineralization event. The Qian’echong granites have moderate negative Eu anomalies and are relatively enriched in light rare earth elements (REE), but depleted in heavy REE, Y, and high field strength elements (HFSE; e.g., Nb, Ta, and Ti). The Qian’echong granites are I-type rather than A- or S-type, and they have high (87Sr/86Sr)i (0.706771–0.710326) and low εNd(t) (−25.5 to −16.8). Two-stage Nd model ages (T2DM) vary between 2.29 and 2.99Ga. Sr–Nd–Pb isotopic data suggest that the Qian’echong granites were not derived from the North China Craton (NCC), but rather were generated from the Yangtze Craton (YC) lower crust. Paleoproterozoic inherited zircon age and whole-rock chemical and Sr–Nd–Pb isotopic data suggest that the Qian’echong granites were derived mainly from partial melting of ultrahigh pressure eclogites, with incorporation of some Paleoproterozoic to Archean YC crustal materials at lower crustal levels. Delamination or foundering of eclogitic lower crust, which extensively occurred in the Dabie orogen during the Early Cretaceous, had not taken place beneath the Qian’echong deposit when it formed. The Qian’echong molybdenum deposit formed in an extensional setting in the Dabie orogen, and may have been associated with a change in the subduction direction of the Izanagi (or Paleo-Pacific) Plate after 135Ma.
ISSN:1367-9120
1878-5786
DOI:10.1016/j.jseaes.2014.02.004