Integration of Nonlinear Crude Distillation Unit Models in Refinery Planning Optimization

Production planning modeling is an essential tool in the operation and management of modern refineries. It has traditionally relied on linear programming (LP) principles and methods for simple and robust planning models, such as the fixed-yield planning models and swing cuts planning models. However...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIndustrial & engineering chemistry research Vol. 50; no. 11; pp. 6860 - 6870
Main Authors Alattas, Abdulrahman M., Grossmann, Ignacio E., Palou-Rivera, Ignasi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington, DC American Chemical Society 01.06.2011
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Production planning modeling is an essential tool in the operation and management of modern refineries. It has traditionally relied on linear programming (LP) principles and methods for simple and robust planning models, such as the fixed-yield planning models and swing cuts planning models. However, these models fail to reflect the true nonlinear nature of the processing units. In this work, the fractionation index model (FI) is developed to add nonlinearity to the linear refinery planning models. The FI model is developed as a more accurate nonlinear model for the complex crude distillation unit (CDU) than the fixed yield or the swing cuts models. The resulting simple model optimizes the crude cuts quantities and temperature. It has the benefits of being crude independent, characteristics of the CDU, and readily calculated. An example of the FI CDU model is presented. The FI-based refinery planning model is then developed and tested with a refinery planning example. The results are compared to the common fixed yield and swing cuts models. The FI refinery planning model predicted higher profit based on different crude purchase decision. Despite an order of magnitude increase in the problem size, the FI planning model did not require significantly longer solution times.
ISSN:0888-5885
1520-5045
DOI:10.1021/ie200151e