An Effective Approach to Rehabilitate Damaged Barrier System Against Piping and Contaminant Flow

• Published in: Geotechnical and geological engineering Vol. 29; no. 1; pp. 13 - 17
• Main Authors: Washington, David, Rodriguez, Daniel, Ogunro, Vincent
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 2011; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Barriers; Case studies; Civil Engineering; Construction; Contaminants; Cut-off; Dam engineering; Dam failure; Dams; Design; Design analysis; Design engineering; Earth and Environmental Science; Earth Sciences; Failure; Failure analysis; Failure modes; Fluid filters; Forensic science; Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences; Hydrogeology; Impoundments; Original Paper; Parameter identification; Parameters; Physical properties; Piping; Pollution monitoring; Rehabilitation; Seepage; Service life; Soil; Soil (material); Soil compaction; Soil contamination; Soil dispersion; Soil formation; Soil properties; Terrestrial Pollution; Walls; Waste Management/Waste Technology; Dam rehabilitation; Forensic sampling; Barrier remediation; Piping; Secant Pile Cutoff wall
• ISSN: 0960-3182; 1573-1529
• DOI: 10.1007/s10706-010-9372-y

The monitoring operation of an older impoundment (such as dams and waste barrier materials) during the service life of the structure cannot be overemphasized. Since older infrastructures seem to be more susceptible to piping and seepage failure, their construction design should be analyzed and monitored at places where a potential problem could occur. Once an impoundment is constructed without adequate filters layers and foundation treatments, then the prevention of piping or seepage may require an effective approach to constructing a cut-off wall to prevent eventual failure. In order to identify and understand theses failure modes, it is important to identify the physical parameters of the impoundment system, such as the zones of various soil gradations, the compaction of these zones, the hydraulic conductivity, the compatibility of the soil formations within and beneath the core or liner, as well as the cohesive and dispersive properties of soils at various location within the structure. Once these parameters are known and quantified, an adequate assessment of the structure’s susceptibility to piping or contaminant transport can be established. This type of an analysis will enable the proper design of a cut-off wall and predetermine the effectiveness of its long-term performance. The Vermont Waterbury Dam (built in 1938) is example of seepage related problem that implemented a cut-off wall design to prevent piping paths from undermining the structure. In this case, some forensic sampling had to be performed and the parameters of the soils as just mentioned were key factors in determining the wall design. In this paper, the Waterbury dam rehabilitation is investigated as case studies, in order to better understand how older designs and poor construction of impoundments can lead to piping condition in dams as well as failures in waste barrier systems. The Secant Cut-off wall (constructed at Waterbury Dam) is mentioned as a corrective measure taken for this dam and there is a brief discussion as to how this construction rehabilitation technique can be applied to waste barrier impoundments.