Influence of a new‐bored neighbouring cavity on the seismic response of an existing tunnel under incident P‐ and SV‐waves

One of the important problems regarding the tunnel design in seismically active areas is the assessment of the mutual effect of two closely running tunnels. With the propagation of seismic waves, the stresses in certain sections of a tunnel, owing to the presence of an adjacent tunnel, can exceed th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEarthquake engineering & structural dynamics Vol. 50; no. 11; pp. 2980 - 3014
Main Authors Zlatanović, Elefterija, Šešov, Vlatko, Lukić, Dragan Č., Bonić, Zoran
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Bognor Regis Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.09.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:One of the important problems regarding the tunnel design in seismically active areas is the assessment of the mutual effect of two closely running tunnels. With the propagation of seismic waves, the stresses in certain sections of a tunnel, owing to the presence of an adjacent tunnel, can exceed those occurring when considering the single‐tunnel case. In the focus of this study is the hitherto unexplored elastic wave diffraction problem, which considers the influence of the presence of a new‐bored neighbouring cavity on the seismic response of an existing tunnel, under incident P‐waves/SV‐waves. The wave function expansion method, the corresponding boundary conditions along the tunnel and cavity contours, and the translational addition theorem for bi‐cylindrical wave functions are jointly employed to develop an exact mathematical solution of the given problem in the form of infinite FourierBessel series, under the plane‐strain conditions. The dynamic effects of structures are presented in the form of a newly introduced dynamic stress alteration factor as a measure of the variation of dynamic hoop stress amplitudes in the lining and the surrounding medium of an existing tunnel affected by the presence of a closely running newly‐constructed tunnel opening. The results of this study are believed to be useful for interpretation of design rules, particularly considering that seismic standards for tunnels are still in the preliminary stage, where the aspect of the minimum seismically safe distance of a newly‐constructed tunnel opening in the vicinity of an existing tunnel should be of particular concern.
ISSN:0098-8847
1096-9845
DOI:10.1002/eqe.3497