Helical Water Chain Mediated Proton Conductivity in Homochiral Metal–Organic Frameworks with Unprecedented Zeolitic unh-Topology

• Published in: Journal of the American Chemical Society Vol. 133; no. 44; pp. 17950 - 17958
• Main Authors: Sahoo, Subash Chandra, Kundu, Tanay, Banerjee, Rahul
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: WASHINGTON American Chemical Society 09.11.2011; Amer Chemical Soc
• Subjects: Chemistry; Chemistry, Multidisciplinary; Crystallography, X-Ray; Models, Molecular; Molecular Conformation; Organometallic Compounds - chemical synthesis; Organometallic Compounds - chemistry; Physical Sciences; Protons; Science & Technology; Water - chemistry; Zeolites - chemistry; Zinc - chemistry; HYDROGEN; CONDUCTORS; COORDINATION POLYMER; BUILDING-BLOCKS; CRYSTAL-STRUCTURES; MMX-CHAIN; ADSORPTION; IMIDAZOLATE FRAMEWORKS; POROUS MATERIAL; MOLECULES
• ISSN: 0002-7863; 1520-5126; 1520-5126
• DOI: 10.1021/ja2078637

Four new homochiral metal–organic framework (MOF) isomers, [Zn( l -L Cl )(Cl)](H2O)2 (1), [Zn( l -L Br )(Br)](H2O)2 (2), [Zn( d -L Cl )(Cl)](H2O)2 (3), and [Zn( d -L Br )(Br)](H2O)2 (4) [L = 3-methyl-2-(pyridin-4-ylmethylamino)butanoic acid], have been synthesized by using a derivative of l-/d-valine and Zn(CH3COO)2·2H2O. A three-periodic lattice with a parallel 1D helical channel was formed along the crystallographic c-axis. Molecular rearrangement results in an unprecedented zeolitic unh-topology in 1–4. In each case, two lattice water molecules (one H-bonded to halogen atoms) form a secondary helical continuous water chain inside the molecular helix. MOFs 1 and 2 shows different water adsorption properties and hence different water affinity. The arrangement of water molecules inside the channel was monitored by variable-temperature single-crystal X-ray diffraction, which indicated that MOF 1 has a higher water holding capacity than MOF 2. In MOF 1, water escapes at 80 °C, while in 2 the same happens at a much lower temperature (∼40 °C). All the MOFs reported here shows reversible crystallization by readily reabsorbing moisture. In MOFs 1 and 2, the frameworks are stable after solvent removal, which is confirmed by a single-crystal to single-crystal transformation. MOFs 1 and 3 show high proton conductivity of 4.45 × 10–5 and 4.42 × 10–5 S cm–1, respectively, while 2 and 4 shows zero proton conductivity. The above result is attributed to the fact that MOF 1 has a higher water holding capacity than MOF 2.