An empirical evaluation of fault-proneness models

Planning and allocating resources for testing is difficult and it is usually done on empirical basis, often leading to unsatisfactory results. The possibility of early estimating the potential faultiness of software could be of great help for planning and executing testing activities. Most research...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering pp. 241 - 251
Main Authors Denaro, Giovanni, Pezzè, Mauro
Format Conference Proceeding Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY, USA ACM 01.01.2002
SeriesACM Conferences
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISBN158113472X
9781581134728
ISSN0270-5257
DOI10.1145/581339.581371

Cover

More Information
Summary:Planning and allocating resources for testing is difficult and it is usually done on empirical basis, often leading to unsatisfactory results. The possibility of early estimating the potential faultiness of software could be of great help for planning and executing testing activities. Most research concentrates on the study of different techniques for computing multivariate models and evaluating their statistical validity, but we still lack experimental data about the validity of such models across different software applications.This paper reports an empirical study of the validity of multivariate models for predicting software fault-proneness across different applications. It shows that suitably selected multivariate models can predict fault-proneness of modules of different software packages.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-2
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Conference Paper-1
content type line 23
SourceType-Conference Papers & Proceedings-1
ObjectType-Article-3
content type line 25
ISBN:158113472X
9781581134728
ISSN:0270-5257
DOI:10.1145/581339.581371