A comparison of morphological data and physical measurements of pore structures in milled peat stockpiles
Physical methods that examine water content and movement in soils are often based on assumptions that the soil is isotropic and homogeneous. For a non-cohesive, porous material such as milled peat, these assumptions are likely to be unrealistic. Soil morphology provides data that cannot be obtained...
Saved in:
Published in | Geoderma Vol. 104; no. 1; pp. 61 - 73 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Amsterdam
Elsevier B.V
01.11.2001
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Physical methods that examine water content and movement in soils are often based on assumptions that the soil is isotropic and homogeneous. For a non-cohesive, porous material such as milled peat, these assumptions are likely to be unrealistic. Soil morphology provides data that cannot be obtained by physical methods, although such measurements are only relevant when applied to a soil in a physical context. Milled peat samples were collected for morphometric observations and physical measurements to determine if the two techniques were comparable with respect to selected characteristics. Porosity representations by both laboratory derivation and image analysis measurement illustrated that direct comparison was not straightforward. Problems with image analysis were generally associated with smaller sample sizes and the spatial resolution of the image. However, image analysis could be based on undisturbed sampling that was vital for a medium like milled peat where a significant hydrological discontinuity exists between the surface and sub-surface. The analysis presented enabled both the water characteristic and a surrogate for hydraulic conductivity to be determined from the collected images, and the evidence suggested that the values obtained were reliable. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0016-7061 1872-6259 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0016-7061(01)00056-8 |