The Supreme Court Decision on Firearm Ownership for People Subject to Restraining Orders

This Viewpoint explicates the complex reasoning the US Supreme Court has used in rulings on gun control and raises concerns that the recent Rahimi decision poses more questions than it settled on the future of the Second Amendment.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association Vol. 332; no. 7; pp. 527 - 528
Main Authors Gostin, Lawrence O, Vladeck, Stephen I
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Medical Association 20.08.2024
Subjects
Court decisions
Domestic Violence - legislation & jurisprudence
Domestic Violence - prevention & control
Firearms - history
Firearms - legislation & jurisprudence
History, 18th Century
History, 19th Century
History, 20th Century
History, 21st Century
Humans
Ownership - history
Ownership - legislation & jurisprudence
Supreme Court Decisions - history
United States
United States
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:This Viewpoint explicates the complex reasoning the US Supreme Court has used in rulings on gun control and raises concerns that the recent Rahimi decision poses more questions than it settled on the future of the Second Amendment.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-General Information-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0098-7484
1538-3598
1538-3598
DOI:10.1001/jama.2024.13915