Electrodeposition Mechanisms and Electrochemical Behavior of Poly(3,4-ethylenedithiathiophene)

The electrodeposition mechanisms of poly(3,4-ethylenedithiathiophene) (PEDTT), which is the sulfur analogue of the well-known poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT), is investigated in acetonitrile solution by means of potentiostatic methods. By analyzing the current transients within electrocryst...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of physical chemistry. C Vol. 111; no. 12; pp. 4553 - 4560
Main Authors Randriamahazaka, H, Sini, G, Tran Van, F
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published American Chemical Society 29.03.2007
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The electrodeposition mechanisms of poly(3,4-ethylenedithiathiophene) (PEDTT), which is the sulfur analogue of the well-known poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT), is investigated in acetonitrile solution by means of potentiostatic methods. By analyzing the current transients within electrocrystallization theory, we observe that the electrodeposition process is a combination of two mechanisms:  progressive nucleation, followed by a diffusion-controlled three-dimensional growth (PN3DD); and an instantaneous nucleation, followed by a three-dimensional growth mechanism with charge transfer as the rate-limiting factor (IN3DC). This trend is contrary to PEDOT electrodeposition mechanisms. Cyclic voltametric measurements show important differences between PEDOT and PEDTT. The most unexpected result is that, although 3,4-ethylenedithiathiophene (EDTT) has a lower oxidation potential than 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene (EDOT), the polymer PEDTT presents a higher oxidation potential and larger band gap than PEDOT. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations reveal important structural and electronic differences between some oligomers of EDTT and EDOT. We analyze these results in terms of the electron-donating effect of the S atom, the difference in the reactivity of the radical-cations of the monomers, and the difference in the geometries of the oligomers.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/TPS-RWZJ4M0W-Z
istex:1E5989E9D8D94FB9A5054C26E307FD2B0A1D9CB1
ISSN:1932-7447
1932-7455
DOI:10.1021/jp068525m