Ensuring Respect for Human Research Participants: Institutional Review Boards and Sharing Results From Research

Institutional review boards (IRBs) are charged with ensuring appropriate respect for research participants and ensuring that the risks participants face are justified. This suggests that IRBs are a logical entity for ensuring the timely reporting of trial results. Doernberg and Wendler discuss how I...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association Vol. 316; no. 11; pp. 1149 - 1150
Main Authors Doernberg, Samuel N, Wendler, David
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Medical Association 20.09.2016
Subjects
Clinical trials
Human subjects
Medical research
Review boards
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Institutional review boards (IRBs) are charged with ensuring appropriate respect for research participants and ensuring that the risks participants face are justified. This suggests that IRBs are a logical entity for ensuring the timely reporting of trial results. Doernberg and Wendler discuss how IRBs might do this.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0098-7484
1538-3598
DOI:10.1001/jama.2016.7970