Mechanistic Investigations of an Enantioselective Hydrogenation Catalyzed by a Ruthenium−BINAP Complex. 1. Stoichiometric and Catalytic Labeling Studies

The enantioselective hydrogenation of (Z)-methyl α-acetamidocinnamate ((Z)-MAC) is catalyzed by [Ru((R)-BINAP)(H)(MeCN) n (sol)3 - n ](BF4) (2, n = 0−3, sol = acetone or methanol, (R)-BINAP = (R)-2,2‘-bis(diphenylphosphino)-1,1‘-binaphthyl) in up to 94% ee (R). The mechanism of this catalytic hydrog...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOrganometallics Vol. 17; no. 11; pp. 2228 - 2240
Main Authors Wiles, Jason A., Bergens, Steven H.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published WASHINGTON American Chemical Society 25.05.1998
Amer Chemical Soc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The enantioselective hydrogenation of (Z)-methyl α-acetamidocinnamate ((Z)-MAC) is catalyzed by [Ru((R)-BINAP)(H)(MeCN) n (sol)3 - n ](BF4) (2, n = 0−3, sol = acetone or methanol, (R)-BINAP = (R)-2,2‘-bis(diphenylphosphino)-1,1‘-binaphthyl) in up to 94% ee (R). The mechanism of this catalytic hydrogenation was investigated using in situ NMR spectroscopy, and by comparing the stereochemistry and regiochemistry of deuterium-labeling studies carried out on the catalytic reaction to those carried out on an isolated, possible catalytic intermediate. The isolated species is the olefin−hydride insertion product, [Ru((R)-BINAP)((S)-MACH)(MeCN)](BF4) ((S C α )-1). Compound (S C α )-1 is the only species present in detectable amounts, by 1H and 31P NMR spectroscopy, during the catalytic hydrogenation at room temperature. The absolute configuration at the stereogenic α-carbon of MACH is the same (assuming stereospecific replacement of ruthenium with hydrogen) as that of the major enantiomer of the catalytic hydrogenation ((R)-N-acetylphenylalanine methyl ester ((R)-MACH2)). Results obtained from the stoichiometric hydrogenolysis and deuteriolysis of (S C α )-1, from the catalytic deuteration of (E)-MAC and (Z)-MAC, and from the reaction of (S C α )-1 with excess (Z)-MAC-Me-d 3 all indicate that formation of (S C α )-1 is rapid and reversible prior to the irreversible hydrogenolysis of the ruthenium−carbon bond. The sum of the stereoselectivities and regioselectivities of the formation and hydrogenolysis of (S C α )-1 equals the stereoselectivity and regioselectivity of the catalytic hydrogenation. Solvolysis of the ruthenium−carbon bond occurs to less than 4% during the catalytic hydrogenation carried out in methanol. Removal of MeCN from the catalyst system has no effect on the enantioselection of the catalytic hydrogenation.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/TPS-CBL7NVBK-X
istex:669FF03AE88103F79D52C362693D1D0D9058FF2E
ISSN:0276-7333
1520-6041
DOI:10.1021/om980113f