From Pipeline to Plant Protection Products: Using New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) in Agrochemical Safety Assessment

The human population will be approximately 9.7 billion by 2050, and food security has been identified as one of the key issues facing the global population. Agrochemicals are an important tool available to farmers that enable high crop yields and continued access to healthy foods, but the average ne...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of agricultural and food chemistry Vol. 72; no. 19; pp. 10710 - 10724
Main Authors Henriquez, Joseph E., Badwaik, Vivek D., Bianchi, Enrica, Chen, Wei, Corvaro, Marco, LaRocca, Jessica, Lunsman, Tamara D., Zu, Chengli, Johnson, Kamin J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Chemical Society 15.05.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The human population will be approximately 9.7 billion by 2050, and food security has been identified as one of the key issues facing the global population. Agrochemicals are an important tool available to farmers that enable high crop yields and continued access to healthy foods, but the average new agrochemical active ingredient takes more than ten years, 350 million dollars, and 20,000 animals to develop and register. The time, monetary, and animal costs incentivize the use of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) in early-stage screening to prioritize chemical candidates. This review outlines NAMs that are currently available or can be adapted for use in early-stage screening agrochemical programs. It covers new in vitro screens that are on the horizon in key areas of regulatory concern. Overall, early-stage screening with NAMs enables the prioritization of development for agrochemicals without human and environmental health concerns through a more directed, agile, and iterative development program before animal-based regulatory testing is even considered.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:0021-8561
1520-5118
DOI:10.1021/acs.jafc.4c00958