Modelling Phosphorus Retention in Lakes and Reservoirs

Steady-state models for the prediction of P retention coefficient (R) in lakes were evaluated using data from 93 natural lakes and 119 reservoirs situated in the temperate zone. Most of the already existing models predicted R relatively successfully in lakes while it was seriously under-estimated in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWater, air & soil pollution: Focus Vol. 6; no. 5-6; pp. 487 - 494
Main Authors Hejzlar, J, Šámalová, K, Boers, P, Kronvang, B
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers 01.12.2006
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Steady-state models for the prediction of P retention coefficient (R) in lakes were evaluated using data from 93 natural lakes and 119 reservoirs situated in the temperate zone. Most of the already existing models predicted R relatively successfully in lakes while it was seriously under-estimated in reservoirs. A statistical analysis indicated the main causes of differences in R between lakes and reservoirs: (a) distinct relationships between P sedimentation coefficient, depth, and water residence time; (b) existence of significant inflow-outflow P concentration gradients in reservoirs. Two new models of different complexity were developed for estimating R in reservoirs: [graphic removed] , where τ is water residence time (year), was derived from the Vollenweider/Larsen and Mercier model by adding a calibrated parameter accounting for spatial P non-homogeneity in the water body, and is applicable for reservoirs but not lakes, and [graphic removed] , where [Pin] is volume-weighted P concentration in all inputs to the water body (μg l-¹), was obtained by re-calibrating the OECD general equation, and is generally applicable for both lakes and reservoirs. These optimised models yield unbiased estimates over a large range of reservoir types.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11267-006-9032-7
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:1567-7230
1573-2940
DOI:10.1007/s11267-006-9032-7