Defining Reactivity of Solid Sorbents: What Is the Most Appropriate Metric?

• Published in: Chemistry of materials Vol. 21; no. 12; pp. 2367 - 2374
• Main Authors: Winter, Megan, Hamal, Dambar, Yang, Xiangxin, Kwen, Haidoo, Jones, David, Rajagopalan, Shyamala, Klabunde, Kenneth J
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: American Chemical Society 23.06.2009
• Subjects: Inorganic Solids and Ceramics; Nanomaterials (Nanops, Nanotubes, etc.); Porous Materials (including Meso- and Micro-Porous Materials)
• ISSN: 0897-4756; 1520-5002
• DOI: 10.1021/cm8032884

A series of solid sorbent materials, including alumina (Al2O3), magnesia (MgO), titania (TiO2), silica (SiO2), and carbon, of widely varying physical properties, have been studied as sorbents for two toxic substances: sulfur dioxide gas (SO2) and chemical warfare surrogate 2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide (2-CEES, ClCH2CH2SCH2CH3). Sorbent surface areas, average pore sizes, pore volumes, surface hydroxyl groups, and nitrogen adsorption−desorption isotherms were measured. Surface areas varied from 18 m2/g to over 1000 m2/g, pore volumes from 0.04 to 1.2 cm3/g, and pore diameters from 1.7 to 4.9 nm. Breakthrough studies of SO2 and 2-CEES sorption yielded information about the effectiveness of each sorbent. Carbon samples worked well for 2-CEES but not SO2, while silica samples were poor for both. The best MgO and TiO2 samples were good for both SO2 and 2-CEES, and overall, the highest surface area (459 m2/g) TiO2 sample was the superior sorbent. The important features for an effective sorbent under the conditions employed are high surface area and high pore volume, possessing isolated surface −OH groups, mesoporous nature, and a polar surface (Lewis base and Lewis acid sites).