Effects of Asparagine Mutagenesis of Conserved Aspartic Acids in Helix 2 (D2.50) and 3 (D3.32) of M1–M4 Muscarinic Receptors on the Irreversible Binding of Nitrogen Mustard Analogs of Acetylcholine and McN-A-343

• Published in: Biochemistry (Easton) Vol. 52; no. 29; pp. 4914 - 4928
• Main Authors: Suga, Hinako, Ehlert, Frederick J
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States American Chemical Society 23.07.2013
• Subjects: Acetylcholine - analogs & derivatives; Acetylcholine - metabolism; Animals; Asparagine - genetics; Aspartic Acid - genetics; CHO Cells; Cricetinae; Cricetulus; Guinea Pigs; Humans; Kinetics; Mechlorethamine - metabolism; Mutagenesis; N-Methylscopolamine - metabolism; Receptors, Muscarinic - chemistry; Receptors, Muscarinic - genetics; Receptors, Muscarinic - metabolism
• ISSN: 0006-2960; 1520-4995
• DOI: 10.1021/bi4003698

We investigated how asparagine mutagenesis of conserved aspartic acids in helix 2 (D2.50) and 3 (D3.32) of M1–M4 muscarinic receptors alters the irreversible binding of acetylcholine mustard and BR384 (4-[(2-bromoethyl)methyl-amino]-2-butynyl N-(3-chlorophenyl)carbamate), a nitrogen mustard derivative of McN-A-343 ([4-[[N-(3-chlorophenyl)carbamoyl]oxy]-2-butynyl] trimethylammonium chloride). The D2.50N mutation moderately increased the affinity of the aziridinium ions of acetylcholine mustard and BR384 for M2–M4 receptors and had little effect on the rate constant for receptor alkylation. The D3.32N mutation greatly reduced the rate constant for receptor alkylation by acetylcholine mustard but not by BR384, although the affinity of BR384 was reduced. The combination of both mutations (D2.50N/D3.32N) substantially reduced the rate constant for receptor alkylation by BR384 relative to that of wild type and mutant D2.50N and D3.32N receptors. The change in binding affinity caused by the mutations suggests that the D2.50N mutation alters the interaction of acetylcholine mustard with D3.32 of the M1 and M3 receptors but not that of the M4 receptor. BR384 exhibited the converse relationship. The simplest explanation is that acetylcholine mustard and BR384 alkylate at least two residues on M1–M4 receptors and that the D2.50N mutation alters the rate of alkylation of D3.32 relative to another residue, perhaps D2.50 itself.