Energy-Transfer Rate in Crystals of Double-Complex Salts Composed of [Ru(N-N)3]2+ (N-N = 2,2‘-Bipyridine or 1,10-Phenanthroline) and [Cr(CN)6]3-: Effect of Relative Orientation between Donor and Acceptor

A block single-crystal was obtained using a diffusion method with a concentrated acetone−water (vol. 1/1) solution of [Ru(phen)3]Cl2·6H2O (phen = 1,10-phenanthroline) and a concentrated aqueous solution of K3[Cr(CN)6], without evaporating solvents. The crystal was identified as a double-complex salt...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInorganic chemistry Vol. 40; no. 14; pp. 3406 - 3412
Main Authors Otsuka, Takuhiro, Sekine, Akiko, Fujigasaki, Naoki, Ohashi, Yuji, Kaizu, Youkoh
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published American Chemical Society 02.07.2001
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A block single-crystal was obtained using a diffusion method with a concentrated acetone−water (vol. 1/1) solution of [Ru(phen)3]Cl2·6H2O (phen = 1,10-phenanthroline) and a concentrated aqueous solution of K3[Cr(CN)6], without evaporating solvents. The crystal was identified as a double-complex salt including two acetone and fourteen solvent water molecules, [Ru(phen)3]2[Cr(CN)6]Cl·2(CH3)2CO·14H2O (1). Measurement of the X-ray diffraction pattern of the double-complex salt was performed using an X-ray diffractometer with an Imaging-Plate (IP) Weissenberg camera. 1 crystallizes in the triclinic space group P1̄, with a = 13.930(5) Å, b = 14.783(5) Å, c = 11.137(6) Å, α = 89.87(4)°, β = 107.47(3)°, γ = 96.68(3)°, and Z = 2. The crystal structure is very different from that of [Ru(bpy)3]2[Cr(CN)6]Cl·8H2O (2) (bpy = 2,2‘-bipyridine), which could be obtained using the same procedure and crystallizes in the monoclinic space group C2, with a = 22.414(2) Å, b = 13.7686(15) Å, c = 22.207(2) Å, β = 90.713(8)°, and Z = 4. The distance between the central-metal ions of ruthenium(II) and chromium(III) complexes in [Ru(phen)3]2[Cr(CN)6]Cl·2(CH3)2CO·14H2O (7.170 Å) is shorter than that in [Ru(bpy)3]2[Cr(CN)6]Cl·8H2O (9.173 Å) by about 2 Å, while the rate of energy transfer from the 3MLCT state of [Ru(N-N)3]2+ to the 2Eg state of [Cr(CN)6]3- in the former salt (9.5 × 105 s-1) is far slower than that in the latter one (6.0 × 106 s-1) at 77 K. These results indicate that the energy-transfer rate strongly depends, not upon the distance between central metal ions, rather, upon the mutual relative orientation between the donor and the acceptor complexes in double-complex salts.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/TPS-Q0H57QZP-4
istex:01D8D252A716CFA161C7DC5FE3CE7E958A586AE5
ISSN:0020-1669
1520-510X
DOI:10.1021/ic0013936