Make the Most of Your Time How Should the Analyst Work with Automated Traceability Tools?

Several recent studies employed traditional information retrieval (IR) methods to assist in the mapping of elements of software engineering artifacts to each other. This activity is referred to as candidate link generation because the final say in determining the final mapping belongs to the human a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational Conference on Software Engineering: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Predictor Models in Software Engineering; 20-26 May 2007 p. 4
Main Authors Dekhtyar, Alex, Hayes, Jane Huffman, Larsen, Jody
Format Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington, DC, USA IEEE Computer Society 20.05.2007
IEEE
SeriesACM Conferences
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Several recent studies employed traditional information retrieval (IR) methods to assist in the mapping of elements of software engineering artifacts to each other. This activity is referred to as candidate link generation because the final say in determining the final mapping belongs to the human analyst. Feedback techniques that utilize information from the analyst (on whether the candidate links are correct or not) have been shown to improve the quality of the mappings. Yet the analyst is making an investment of time in providing the feedback. This leads to the question of whether or not guidance can be provided to the analyst on how to best utilize that time. This paper simulates a number of approaches an analyst might take to evaluating the same candidate link list, and discovers that more structured and organized approaches appear to save time/effort of the analyst.
Bibliography:SourceType-Conference Papers & Proceedings-1
ObjectType-Conference Paper-1
content type line 25
ISBN:9780769529547
0769529542
DOI:10.1109/PROMISE.2007.8