Structural and Electronic Features of β‑Ni(OH)2 and β‑NiOOH from First Principles
NiO x , long studied for its use in nickel-based secondary batteries, has been the subject of much recent interest due to its efficacy as an oxygen evolution catalyst. Despite extensive study over more than a century, however, many outstanding questions remain surrounding both the structure and the...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of physical chemistry. C Vol. 119; no. 43; pp. 24315 - 24322 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
American Chemical Society
29.10.2015
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | NiO x , long studied for its use in nickel-based secondary batteries, has been the subject of much recent interest due to its efficacy as an oxygen evolution catalyst. Despite extensive study over more than a century, however, many outstanding questions remain surrounding both the structure and the activity of NiO x . Further compounding this ambiguity is the recent finding that much of the previous experimental work on NiO x may have been influenced by incidental doping. Here, we report a computational study of the two simplest members of the NiO x family: β-Ni(OH)2 and β-NiOOH. Using DFT+U calculations, we first identify a β-NiOOH structure with a staggered arrangement of intercalated protons that is more consistent with experimental crystal structures of β-NiOOH than previously proposed geometries. Next, by conducting a thorough study of various initial spin configurations of this β-NiOOH structure, we found that a low-spin d7 Ni3+ configuration is always favored, which suggests a Jahn–Teller distortion, rather than disproportionation, explains the different Ni–O bond distances found in experiment. G 0 W 0 calculations performed on β-Ni(OH)2 and β-NiOOH reveal electronic structures consistent with previous experimental results. Lastly, calculations of various low-index surface energies of both β-Ni(OH)2 and β-NiOOH demonstrate that the (001) surface is the most thermodynamically stable surface, in keeping with numerous experimental results but in contrast to recent computational models. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1932-7447 1932-7455 1932-7455 |
DOI: | 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b08481 |