Deriving executable process descriptions from UML
In the recent past, a relevant effort has been devoted to the definition of process modeling languages (PMLs). The resulting languages and environments -although technically successful-did not receive much attention from industry. On the contrary, researchers and practitioners have recently started...
Saved in:
Published in | Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering pp. 155 - 165 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Conference Proceeding Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York, NY, USA
ACM
2002
|
Series | ACM Conferences |
Subjects |
Software and its engineering
> Software creation and management
> Software development process management
Software and its engineering
> Software notations and tools
> General programming languages
> Language features
> Procedures, functions and subroutines
|
Online Access | Get full text |
ISBN | 158113472X 9781581134728 |
ISSN | 0270-5257 |
DOI | 10.1145/581339.581361 |
Cover
Summary: | In the recent past, a relevant effort has been devoted to the definition of process modeling languages (PMLs). The resulting languages and environments -although technically successful-did not receive much attention from industry. On the contrary, researchers and practitioners have recently started experimenting with the usage of UML as a PML. Being so popular and widely used, UML has an important competitive advantage compared to any specialized PML. However, it has also a main limitation. While most PMLs are executable by some process engine, UML was conceived as a non-executable, semi-formal language. The work described here aims at assessing the possibility of employing a subset of UML as an executable PML. The article proposes a formalization of the semantics of the UML subset and presents the translation of UML process models into code, which can be enacted in the OPSS process-centered environment. The paper also presents a case study to validate the approach. We expect that process modeling by means of UML is easier and available to a larger community of software process managers. Moreover, process enactment makes the process more efficient, reliable, predictable and controllable, as widely shown by previous research. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | SourceType-Scholarly Journals-2 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Conference Paper-1 content type line 23 SourceType-Conference Papers & Proceedings-1 ObjectType-Article-3 content type line 25 |
ISBN: | 158113472X 9781581134728 |
ISSN: | 0270-5257 |
DOI: | 10.1145/581339.581361 |