Why Evidence Generation Should Matter to Payers and How They Can Help

• Published in: JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association Vol. 332; no. 5; p. 412
• Main Authors: Abbasi, Ali B, Curtis, Lesley H, Fleisher, Lee A, Califf, Robert M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 06.08.2024
• Subjects: Clinical Trials as Topic; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration; United States
• ISSN: 1538-3598
• DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.7616

The US leads the world in bringing new medical products to market, but the ability to generate evidence to inform clinical practice in postmarket settings needs improvement. Although a diverse group of stakeholders is working to improve postmarket evidence generation, the role of private payers has been underappreciated. Payers are crucial allies in improving evidence generation because better data would better inform coverage decisions, their policies and practices influence the conduct of care and research, and their claims data are a source of real-world evidence used in medical product evaluation. In addition, payers have a stake in improving evidence generation because the kinds of evidence needed to inform health care and coverage decisions are often not available when a product enters the market and may not be generated without their involvement. Here, we describe several key steps payers could take to improve evidence generation, including participating in efforts to reduce administrative and financial barriers to the conduct of clinical trials, directly incentivizing evidence generation on high-priority questions by funding potential cost-saving trials, increasing engagement with the medical products industry on evidentiary needs for coverage decisions, and improving usability of claims data by reducing data lags and routinely recording unique device identifiers. Broad payer engagement with US Food and Drug Administration recommendations regarding evidence generation will ensure that the opportunities to participate in clinical research are extended to all communities and that evidence needed to inform care is generated in trials and surveillance systems that reflect the clinical reality across the US. Increasing payer involvement in evidence generation can benefit all participants in the medical innovation ecosystem. The importance of payers in these efforts will continue to grow in response to imperatives to increase integration of care and research, engage a diverse set of communities in clinical research, and move toward alternative payment models.