Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment with Microbial Source Tracking for Mixed Fecal Sources Contaminating Recreational River Waters, Iowa, USA

Fecal contamination of surface water can cause acute gastrointestinal illness (AGI) among recreators. AGI risk varies among human, livestock, and wildlife fecal sources, but the prevalence of individual sources is unknown for most recreational sites. We estimated AGI risk for six sites near Des Moin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inACS ES&T water Vol. 4; no. 7; pp. 2789 - 2802
Main Authors Burch, Tucker R., Stokdyk, Joel P., Firnstahl, Aaron D., Opelt, Sarah A., Cook, Rachel M., Heffron, Joseph A., Brown, Amanda, Hruby, Claire, Borchardt, Mark A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published American Chemical Society 12.07.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Fecal contamination of surface water can cause acute gastrointestinal illness (AGI) among recreators. AGI risk varies among human, livestock, and wildlife fecal sources, but the prevalence of individual sources is unknown for most recreational sites. We estimated AGI risk for six sites near Des Moines, Iowa, using quantitative microbial risk assessment combined with microbial source-tracking (MST). Water samples (n = 147) collected over two years were tested for 36 qPCR assays quantifying waterborne pathogens and MST markers specific to avian, bovine, human, and porcine fecal sources. Average swimming risk across all sites was 5 (95% CI: 0.0030–142) to 67 (16–215) AGI cases per 1,000 recreators. Individual fecal sources were rarely associated with swimming exposures where risk was >36 AGI cases per 1,000 recreators; most high-risk exposures were associated with simultaneous occurrence of multiple fecal sources. Iowa’s beach action value for Escherichia coli (235 MPN/100 mL) identified >90% of high-risk exposures at five of six sites, so was generally protective of public health in this setting. For sites influenced by mixed fecal sources, results illustrate that identifying a single dominant source of risk is less important than recognizing the number of unique fecal sources that impact AGI risk.
ISSN:2690-0637
2690-0637
DOI:10.1021/acsestwater.3c00652