Effects of Total Pressure Distribution on Performance of Small-Size Counter-Rotating Axial-Flow Fan Stage for Electrical Propulsion

Abstract Counter-rotating fan provides significant benefits over the conventional fan in terms of overall performance and size. For electric propulsion application, a counter-rotating fan provides compactness and reduction in weight to achieve higher pressure rise with less power consumption as comp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inASME Open Journal of Engineering Vol. 1
Main Authors Bandopadhyay, Tuhin, Mistry, Chetan S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.01.2022
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Counter-rotating fan provides significant benefits over the conventional fan in terms of overall performance and size. For electric propulsion application, a counter-rotating fan provides compactness and reduction in weight to achieve higher pressure rise with less power consumption as compared to the unducted propeller. Past literature suggests counter-rotating fans, designed with higher loading in the front rotor, have a flat performance map and a wider range of stable operation. The recommendation of higher aerodynamic loading is not clear what needs to be the aerodynamic load split amongst the rotors. This, in particular, benefits the electrical vehicle to have higher maneuver capability during operation. The paper discusses the design methodology of counter-rotating fans for application in roadable electric aircraft and the effect of different aerodynamic load distributions for both rotors on its overall performance. Fans are designed for different total-pressure rise and loading distributions as (1) 50–50%, (2) 55–45%, (3) 60–40%, and (4) 65–35% in front and rear rotor. It is observed that, as the loading increases for the front rotor, blade camber increases and hence to more prone toward flow separation near the trailing edge under an adverse pressure gradient. Wake coming from the front rotor grows thicker with higher loading, leading to flow acceleration (thus total-pressure loss) in the axial gap between these rotors. As a consequence, flow incidents on the rear rotor other than the design incidence, and thus the rear rotor operates under off-design. With 55–45% loading, both the rotors achieve desired total-pressure rise and stable operating range. The detailed flow field study is discussed to bring important outcomes for achieving the desired performance.
ISSN:2770-3495
2770-3495
DOI:10.1115/1.4053962