大租權土地制度之分析

淸國統治時期,台灣盛行「一田兩主」制度,一塊土地同時有大租戶 與小租戶兩位地主。文獻上普遍認爲,在大小租制度下,土地所有 權不明確。財產權制度是市場經濟的基礎,若大小租使財產權不明 確,農民投資土地的誘因會下降。本文說明大租的起源,解釋台灣 爲何盛行大小租制度,並推論大租比率高的地區是台灣較早開發之 地。本文的實証結果發現,至少在日治初期之前,大租權存在對於財 產權之負面影響並不大,並對此一結果提出解釋...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJing ji lun wen cong kan Vol. 45; no. 2; pp. 299 - 337
Main Author 吳聰敏(Tsong-Min Wu)
Format Journal Article
LanguageChinese
Published 台灣 臺灣大學經濟學系 01.06.2017
國立臺灣大學經濟學系
Taiwan Economic Review
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1018-3833
DOI10.6277/TER.2017.452.3

Cover

More Information
Summary:淸國統治時期,台灣盛行「一田兩主」制度,一塊土地同時有大租戶 與小租戶兩位地主。文獻上普遍認爲,在大小租制度下,土地所有 權不明確。財產權制度是市場經濟的基礎,若大小租使財產權不明 確,農民投資土地的誘因會下降。本文說明大租的起源,解釋台灣 爲何盛行大小租制度,並推論大租比率高的地區是台灣較早開發之 地。本文的實証結果發現,至少在日治初期之前,大租權存在對於財 產權之負面影響並不大,並對此一結果提出解釋
During Ch'ing rule, much of Taiwan's land had two owners, ta-tsu (large rent right owners) and hsiao-tsu (small rent right owners). Property rights are essential for economic development, and it is often argued that a land with ta-tsu would be less well-protected. This study explains the origin of Taiwan’s ta-tsu rights system, and why it was widespread in Taiwan. We argue that an area with a larger ta-tsu ratio was cultivated earlier. Did the ta-tsu system have a negative effect on agricultural investment? Our analysis shows that the negative effect, if any, was relatively minor. We also propose an explanation for the result.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1018-3833
DOI:10.6277/TER.2017.452.3