PTH-133Electronic Personal Health Records For Patients On Home Parenteral Nutrition: A Patient Satisfaction Survey

IntroductionThe public demand for flexible access to health information and services is growing, encouraged by Intnet trends and policies promoting patient involvement. Patients Know Best registered (PKB) is an electronic patient centred system providing a secure forum for patients to interact with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGut Vol. 63; no. Suppl 1; p. A270
Main Authors Ambrose, T, Topan, R, Small, M, Nightingale, J M, Gabe, S M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.06.2014
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract IntroductionThe public demand for flexible access to health information and services is growing, encouraged by Intnet trends and policies promoting patient involvement. Patients Know Best registered (PKB) is an electronic patient centred system providing a secure forum for patients to interact with healthcare teams. With increasing use of this system by our home parenteral nutrition patients we aimed to assess patient satisfaction with a survey.MethodsPKB was introduced to patients during routine clinic visits and verbal consent obtained. We recorded the frequency of use, total number of electronic discussions held and the number of additional carers (other healthcare staff or family members) involved in their personal health record. We distributed a 10 question survey to all users.Results119 patients (50 male, 69 female) were registered over a period of 18 months with a median age of 49 years (range 17-85 years, mean 48 years). A total of 5015 unique electronic conversations were recorded. These would usually have occurred via telephone. PKB has been used for 4 patients transitioning from paediatric to adult services and 2 patients from abroad. Other patients invited included 128 outside clinicians (eg local nutrition nurses and dietitians, transplant coordinators) and 29 carers. There were 58/119 (48.7%) responses including 1 incomplete dataset (61% female). 31/57 patients (54.4%) were over 50 years of age. 42/57 (73.7%) received parenteral nutrition and 13/57 (22.8%) fluids and electrolytes. 51/58 (87.9%) patients felt at least "somewhat confident" working online with their healthcare team and the same number felt that having access to the results was at least "somewhat helpful" - 32 (62.7%) of these responding "very/extremely helpful". 30/58 (51.7%) use PKB a few times a month, 4/58 (6.9%) a few times a week and the remainder less frequently. The more useful features of PKB included Discussions (ie contacting the St Mark's Nutrition team electronically) and Monitoring (ie test results). Patients use PKB to contact doctors/nutrition nurses more than dietitians/administrators.ConclusionOur survey suggests that our patient cohort find this a useful facility to contact us and improve the management of their long-term conditions. Not all patients access PKB regularly and they only had a short period in which to respond to the survey. This may explain the 49% response rate in an otherwise motivated patient population. This is an emerging and effective way for patients to interact with their healthcare teams and we have not found it has increased our workload. The ability to communicate seamlessly between different healthcare professionals reduces the current difficulties which exist when transferring information between multiple care providers (eg HIFNET).Disclosure of InterestNone Declared.
AbstractList IntroductionThe public demand for flexible access to health information and services is growing, encouraged by Intnet trends and policies promoting patient involvement. Patients Know Best registered (PKB) is an electronic patient centred system providing a secure forum for patients to interact with healthcare teams. With increasing use of this system by our home parenteral nutrition patients we aimed to assess patient satisfaction with a survey.MethodsPKB was introduced to patients during routine clinic visits and verbal consent obtained. We recorded the frequency of use, total number of electronic discussions held and the number of additional carers (other healthcare staff or family members) involved in their personal health record. We distributed a 10 question survey to all users.Results119 patients (50 male, 69 female) were registered over a period of 18 months with a median age of 49 years (range 17-85 years, mean 48 years). A total of 5015 unique electronic conversations were recorded. These would usually have occurred via telephone. PKB has been used for 4 patients transitioning from paediatric to adult services and 2 patients from abroad. Other patients invited included 128 outside clinicians (eg local nutrition nurses and dietitians, transplant coordinators) and 29 carers. There were 58/119 (48.7%) responses including 1 incomplete dataset (61% female). 31/57 patients (54.4%) were over 50 years of age. 42/57 (73.7%) received parenteral nutrition and 13/57 (22.8%) fluids and electrolytes. 51/58 (87.9%) patients felt at least "somewhat confident" working online with their healthcare team and the same number felt that having access to the results was at least "somewhat helpful" - 32 (62.7%) of these responding "very/extremely helpful". 30/58 (51.7%) use PKB a few times a month, 4/58 (6.9%) a few times a week and the remainder less frequently. The more useful features of PKB included Discussions (ie contacting the St Mark's Nutrition team electronically) and Monitoring (ie test results). Patients use PKB to contact doctors/nutrition nurses more than dietitians/administrators.ConclusionOur survey suggests that our patient cohort find this a useful facility to contact us and improve the management of their long-term conditions. Not all patients access PKB regularly and they only had a short period in which to respond to the survey. This may explain the 49% response rate in an otherwise motivated patient population. This is an emerging and effective way for patients to interact with their healthcare teams and we have not found it has increased our workload. The ability to communicate seamlessly between different healthcare professionals reduces the current difficulties which exist when transferring information between multiple care providers (eg HIFNET).Disclosure of InterestNone Declared.
Author Small, M
Nightingale, J M
Topan, R
Ambrose, T
Gabe, S M
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: T
  surname: Ambrose
  fullname: Ambrose, T
– sequence: 2
  givenname: R
  surname: Topan
  fullname: Topan, R
– sequence: 3
  givenname: M
  surname: Small
  fullname: Small, M
– sequence: 4
  givenname: J
  surname: Nightingale
  middlename: M
  fullname: Nightingale, J M
– sequence: 5
  givenname: S
  surname: Gabe
  middlename: M
  fullname: Gabe, S M
BookMark eNqVisFKAzEUAHOoYKv-gryjl9SXZrfpehNp2ZMutvcS4qumpInmJYJ_7wr6AZ6GGWYmJjFFEuJa4Vwpvbx9reUYg1ygaqRGs1jqeWu6iZgiKiNb03TnYsZ8RMTVqlNTkYddL5XW60Cu5BS9g4Eyp2gD9GRDeYNncim_MGxShsEWT7EwPEXo04nGkEenPO6PtWRffIp3cP83wnYkH6z76bCt-ZO-LsXZwQamq19eiJvNevfQy_ecPipx2Z88OwrBRkqV98q0ujGIxuh_rN-hDFcN
ContentType Journal Article
DBID 7T5
H94
DOI 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307263.579
DatabaseName Immunology Abstracts
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
DatabaseTitle AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
Immunology Abstracts
DatabaseTitleList AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EndPage A270
GroupedDBID ---
.55
.VT
08G
0R~
18M
29I
2WC
39C
3V.
4.4
40O
53G
5GY
5VS
7T5
7X7
7~S
88E
88I
8AF
8F7
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
AAHLL
AAOJX
AAUVZ
AAWJN
AAYEP
ABAAH
ABJNI
ABKDF
ABMQD
ABOCM
ABTFR
ABUWG
ABVAJ
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACGOD
ACGTL
ACHTP
ACMFJ
ACOFX
ACTZY
ADBBV
ADFRT
ADUGQ
AENEX
AFKRA
AFWFF
AHMBA
AHNKE
AHQMW
AJYBZ
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AZQEC
BAWUL
BBNVY
BENPR
BHPHI
BLJBA
BOMFT
BPHCQ
BTHHO
BVXVI
C45
CCPQU
CS3
CXRWF
DU5
DWQXO
E3Z
EBS
EJD
F5P
FD8
FYUFA
GNUQQ
H13
H94
HAJ
HCIFZ
HMCUK
HZ~
IH2
L7B
LK8
M1P
M2P
M7P
N9A
NXWIF
O9-
OVD
P2P
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
RHF
RHI
RMJ
RPM
RV8
TEORI
TR2
UKHRP
UYXKK
V24
VM9
VVN
WH7
X7M
YFH
YOC
YQY
ZY1
ID FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_17534700773
ISSN 0017-5749
IngestDate Fri Oct 25 08:42:29 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue Suppl 1
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-proquest_miscellaneous_17534700773
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Feature-2
PQID 1753470077
PQPubID 23462
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1753470077
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20140601
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2014-06-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2014
  text: 20140601
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationTitle Gut
PublicationYear 2014
SSID ssj0008891
Score 4.311527
Snippet IntroductionThe public demand for flexible access to health information and services is growing, encouraged by Intnet trends and policies promoting patient...
SourceID proquest
SourceType Aggregation Database
StartPage A270
Title PTH-133Electronic Personal Health Records For Patients On Home Parenteral Nutrition: A Patient Satisfaction Survey
URI https://search.proquest.com/docview/1753470077
Volume 63
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1ba8IwFA6bwtjL2JVdJYM9DEqdbdXq3rpRJ6JVZoW-SWPj2JgVqt3Dfv1OmqStKMztpdgYmsL5-p2ck3NB6M7XdJ9OTKr6TS1QQePBN6dTQw2CaqBR0mgSk2Uj95x6e1TteDUvC2tOskuWpDz53phX8h-pwhjIlWXJ_kGy6UNhAH6DfOEKEobrVjIeuG0VrD8718pG7K1lehG3LhdKax6xavzvST5bP1RYd3QYYKWZmFNKcWRRfp6pLqYqw1zuA3BM9LV6CvwSp0Ez1oxEokljGnbtgkEergQlDmc-P-ZI_T0Ocw6wttw8rLkj_hF-CK2axUtJbgV9VzN5AVLJrYK8OIaSPqWKlqNLS-ddQ4TqlbfrtJ70nXmLlx_hp5osDtSk141yjXeiWa2j7fTHrVG3O3Ztz91FRR0oiHGf6aWmOIvt0qSOZu8scsdhnYfNq6yp6mT_4R6iA2E4YIuj4Ajt0PAY7fVEaMQJitbAgCUYMAcDFmDAAAYswYD7IWZgwBkYcAqGR2zJiTgPBcyhcIruW7b73FblO4-BNNhJkB_SebwYs_KsVZOVcjLOUCGch_Qc4QkF27gScB8B7MOJFkxhO0ymPiGNScW4QLe_Pu5yizlXaD_DzzUqLKOY3sDObklKiZBKqPhkO4PXH8E0Vic
link.rule.ids 315,783,787,27936,27937,31732,33757
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PTH-133Electronic+Personal+Health+Records+For+Patients+On+Home+Parenteral+Nutrition%3A+A+Patient+Satisfaction+Survey&rft.jtitle=Gut&rft.au=Ambrose%2C+T&rft.au=Topan%2C+R&rft.au=Small%2C+M&rft.au=Nightingale%2C+J+M&rft.date=2014-06-01&rft.issn=0017-5749&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=Suppl+1&rft.spage=A270&rft.epage=A270&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136%2Fgutjnl-2014-307263.579&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0017-5749&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0017-5749&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0017-5749&client=summon